Talk:Deritend

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"Peter de Bermingham" is implied to be the source from which the name of the city of Birmingham was derived. Yet in Digbeth "Beorma" is mentioned. Which is it? Can anyone provide some clarification? --Sasoriza 23:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a few words to hopefully reduce that implication. Obviously the name Peter of Bermingham defines which came first. Oosoom ^{Talk to me} 10:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deritend. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100611162540/http://www.theoldcrown.com/history_1.html to http://www.theoldcrown.com/history_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Etymolgy

The etymology shown does not seem very plausible. Perhaps a Brittonic source should be considered. ^[1]

References

^ https://www.stonnall-history-group.org.uk/articles/Echoes_from_the_Past.html

[1] ttps://www.stonnall-history-group.org.uk/articles/Echoes_from_the_Past.html

[1]