Talk:Department of State v. Muñoz
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A fact from Department of State v. Muñoz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the U.S. Supreme Court held in Department of State v. Muñoz (2024) that a U.S. citizen "does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country"?
- Source: Slip opinion L.A. Times Washington Post
- ALT1: ... that the U.S. Supreme Court recently decided that the fundamental right to marriage does not give a U.S. citizen a fundamental right to bring her non-citizen spouse to the United States? Source: Bloomberg Law
- ALT2: ...that the U.S. Supreme Court case Department of State v. Muñoz (2024) decided that the fundamental right to marry does not give a U.S. citizen a right to challenge her spouse's visa denial? Source: Bloomberg Law
- Reviewed:
Created by SilverLocust (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
SilverLocust 💬 15:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) (edited 11:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC)).
- @SilverLocust: Article is long enough and created a day before DYK nom. Article is well-sourced, presentable, and generally free from copyvio excluding direct quotes from court proceedings. QPQ not needed. Of the hooks, I think ALT2 is the best-worded; all hooks are sourced. The issue I have with this article is the lead. It's too short at the moment; I would recommend adding a couple of sentences giving details on the background of the course. Kimikel (talk) 02:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Kimikel: I have expanded the lead. Also note that the quoted opinions are not subject to copyright. SilverLocust 💬 05:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Right I was aware, I just noted it so that if anyone else checked and saw a high copyvio score they would know why. New lead section looks good, this is ready to go. Thank you for your nomination SilverLocust - Kimikel (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)