Talk:Demolition waste

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Se626314.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation for PBIO 4180J

Is the material organized and focused? Are there several headings and subheadings? Is the presentation understandable?

The material is somewhat focused; all the information provided is on topic.
There are currently no headings or subheadings separating information; just separate paragraphs.
The article is understandable with very little background information.
There is not enough specific information for there to be proper organization.

What is the quality of the evidence? Does the article have references or is it just someone’s knowledge? Are the references reliable sources? Why or why not. Were assumptions made?

Only one line of the stub is cited to a broken link. The article is a majority someone’s knowledge or is just cited inaccurately.
If the link worked correctly, the National Safety Council would be a neutral, reputable source. The National Safety is a long-established nonprofit that works to reduce the number of preventable deaths using researched methods.

Does the article have an introduction? Is the introduction understandable and does it summarize the article’s key points? Does the article cover the topic comprehensively, partially, or is it an overview? Is there anything missing/How might the content be improved? Are there images and diagrams at appropriate places, and appendices and footnotes at the end?

The introduction is clear, concise, and understandable without prior knowledge on the subject.
The article it a very simple overview, there is no in-depth information.
The content can be improved by adding detailed information from credible sources.
Some aspects of the article to expand on include details about the composition of demolition waste, adding more information about processing the major components, and currently utilized recycling techniques.
There is a single image that is placed nicely, but more images may be beneficial.
There are no footnotes or appendices.

Is the coverage neutral (unbiased)? Are facts emphasized?

The article is currently written with unbiased, neutral language.
Without references, it is hard to know if the statements made in the article are based on facts.

Se626314 (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]