Talk:Defining equation (physical chemistry)

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

chemical spillage

The physical chem section in the defining equation (physics) article and some thermodynamics formulae bloated that article, it makes sense spill this overflow into a new article containing all chemical definitions. All other chemical definitions will be added soon... Maschen (talk) 18:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List?

This article is almost a list. Is it worth formally reclassifying it as such? Brammers (talk/c) 17:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It clearly is a list, not just change the settings? Maschen (talk) 12:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move thermodynamics content back to defining equation (physics)

I propose this move since these definitions are from statistical thermodynamics - not just chemistry, both fields make use of them but we can say this in the articles and cross-link between them. Just becuase one definition is called "chemical potential", doesn't imply it has to be in this article... This article should concentrate (excuse pun) on the intrinsic chemical definitions such as the reaction kinetics, energetics, atomic quantification, electronegativity etc. as already inlcuded. I'll move the content now. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 06:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

See here, thanks, Maschen (talk) 12:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]