Talk:Define the Great Line/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Looks fine so far.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Needs additional commas in many sentences. They're Only Chasing Safety is linked in the "style" subsection, after it gets mentioned in the "lyrics" subsection; change around. It's not "Billboard Top 200", it's just "Billboard 200" as the album charts, an should be italicized and wikilinked.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- There are references that are missing publisher, accessdate, author and date published. The personnel section is unsourced.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- There are citations in the lead, and there's a paragraph in the "lyrics" subsection that doesn't have a citation at the end.
- C. It contains no original research:
- The last sentence of the paragraph with no citation at the end is original research.
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Okay
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Looks good.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Well it didn't pass today; address the issues, then feel free to renominate it.
- Pass or Fail:
