Jump to content

Talk:Deckham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDeckham has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 1, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
Pass --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Deckham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 16:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Wikilinks should only be made if they are relevant to the context. Common words do not need wikilinking.
    • Grammatical errors such as "council council ward" found. If in any case you mean it, change it to something else.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • An image caption should only end with a full-stop if it forms a complete sentence.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Captions not fixed. Wikilinks not fixed.--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Which ones, specifically? Meetthefeebles (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The reviewer is going to have to give explicit examples as I cannot see what to correct from such a sweeping statement.J3Mrs (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, some of 'em here.

Captions not fixed.

  • "1895 Ordnance Survey Map of the early Deckham settlement (marked in red)." and "Deckhall Hall and the two public houses are clearly evidenced."
  • "The shopping area on Old Durham Road is the economic hub of the area."

I've amended the first caption so that it is now a continuous sentence but the second one is already a complete sentence, not a fragment, and therefore requires a full stop per WP:MOS Meetthefeebles (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks not fixed.

--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've removed the post office link but can't understand why tinkers should be undone; it is a colloquial word used predominantly by Scots and people from the North of England only. The blue link here assists readers from outside those areas Meetthefeebles (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it was a mistake. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Is there anything else you suggest is outstanding? Meetthefeebles (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fix "View from the southern end of Old Durham Road. The steep slope north towards central Gateshead is apparent and the cityscape of Newcastle–upon–Tyne is clearly visible."
Eliminate wikilinks of open space, latitude, longitude and MP (and anymore you find).--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 08:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've done as suggested with the exception of open space. This is a borderline technical term which some readers may not understand fully (open space can mean green fields, parks, derelict land etc depending on the context) and I think the blue link assists. I've also removed a few more examples of possible over-linking. Meetthefeebles (talk) 09:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Deckham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deckham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deckham&oldid=1206912745"