Talk:Decency

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Mid‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

stub

This stub is pretty barebones and only mentions some English law. "Indecency" has been defined in US legislation and is a major topic of contention these days. I'll try to update the article soon. Ztrawhcs 14:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gross indecency?

"Gross indecency" redirects here, but is not actually defined in the article. 217.155.20.163 19:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, that's what I was looking for as well. --81.79.29.103 23:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

article is too limited

I was looking for the moral meaning, as in "so-and-so is a very decent person". That doesn't mean the person dresses modestly or anything like that, etc. Expand? 67.117.130.181 11:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expand away :) -BStarky 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this article needs to go...

I would suggest that everything below the "see also" section be removed. It's just a list of various comments relating to the topic, in no coherent order. It almost looks like a wikipedia discussion page... --69.69.41.43 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a long history of "decency decrees" aimed at reforming behavior as well as art and literature. Why is it not covered here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.148.11.95 (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal ?

Hi, where did the merger proposal discussion go (Cannot find it on the Obscenity p. either) ? I am not in favor, by the way, and would rather delete the page which is already on Wikt.--Caleb Crabb 09:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caleb Crabb (talk • contribs) [reply]