Talk:Deathcore/List of deathcore bands

Motionless in White???

They're not deathcore, they're metalcore. wtf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.243.244.142 (talk) 04:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Removed some bands

bullcrap —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.139.126 (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Bands such as "As blood runs black" and "bring me the horizon" don't really count as deathcore. I mean, their riffs don't really count as death metal.

-Kunundrum

Yes, yes they are considered deathcore. They sound like metalcore, but heavier. Deathcore is not suppose to sound like death metal stupid.--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I believe Bring Me The Horizon should be removed, for the fact that they aren't deathcore, and also because they're a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.142.213 (talk) 08:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion doesn't matter on Wikipedia. If a band is sourced reliably (in this case the band is) then it stays on this list and can't be removed without reasonable consensus (like the source used was deemed unreliable at the reliable sources noticeboard or something along those lines). FireCrystal (talk) 00:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Removed bands

Wow someone just put a bunch of emo bands on here, very cute. ~Klutz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.80.32.250 (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I have removed bands with no article, due to being self promotion. If they are notable, they should have an article. If not, they should not be added. --Dane ^~nya 16:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

• Can we please stop adding bands with no articles. It would be most appreciated. -ARandomHeretic 00:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Lay off with the Black Dahlia Murder. They are a melodic death metal band. I repeat: NO BREAKDOWNS IN THEIR LAST TWO RELEASES NOT DEATHCORE.- Karen

breakdowns dont make it hardcore. Black Dahlia Murder set the scene for deathcore. they are probably the most definitive deathcore band. oh and btw Parkway Drive is NOT deathcore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.141.161.66 (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

You could easily argue that Glass Casket, Despised Icon, and Job For A Cowboy and the Arizona scene set everything into motion, actually. From aesthetic to actual sound, BDM have nothing to do with this. And yes, breakdowns do have a lot to do with the -core suffix attributed to the subgenre, besides lame songwriting and aesthetics, but that's a non-issue for this page. -Karen

BDM are NOT deathcore thats been an argument running through wikipedia for at least a year now, probably longer. Check the BDM page all genre tags have been removed, they also do not belong on the list. Lokri (talk) 17:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

List Of Popular Deathcore Bands To Be Added To List Upon Articles Being Written For Them

• A Black Rose Burial
• Annihilate The Bodies
• Annotations of an Autopsy
• As For Us
• Cholera
• Choptop
• Crimson Falls
• Desecrate The Day
• Destroyer Destroyer
• Elysia
• Hematidrosis
• The Irish Front
• My Autumn —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadPromQueen12 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
• The Red Shore
• Rose Funeral
• Salt The Wound

• When these bands get record labels or recognized by a larger audience than what they have now, they can be added, however, I know for a fact that A Black Rose Burial, Irish Front, and others on that list do not have a record label, nor do they have too much recognition outside of their local scene (Don't use a MySpace reference to counter that -_-). -ARandomHeretic 05:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree completely, just putting there here for future reference and ease.

I see a lot of bands that have an article and are in the list. Lolhax0r (talk) 07:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

i added my autumn cause theyre sweet, and growing. if youre mad please dont be, i just think it should be on there. : DeadPromQueen12

I personally don't "like" Annotations of an Autopsy but I have listened to their music. They Deffinately need to be added to the list. They are a pretty brutal Deathcore band. : Deathcoreman

Added Band

I just added Carnifex & Knights of the Abyss to the list, they seem to be getting pretty popular, whatt do you guys think?

That's cool, it's only we're trying toonly add those with wiki articles. So, if they have one, great. -Karen

Carnifex should definitely be added to the list, but the only thing is they don't have an article... They're even signed and all. And they're popular...well, at least more popular than some others on there. Lolhax0r (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Some Bands Need To Be Removed

Killwhitneydead are Deathgrind See You Next Tuesday are Scene kids attempting Grindcore Parkway Drive are Metalcore, they are just a bit more brutal than usual. Revise the list! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.203.42.143 (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Killwhitneydead is Deathcore. I don't know what you're on about. Rawwwrr! 10:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Killwhitneydead is definitely deathcore. See You Next Tuesday needs to be revised though. Parkway Drive is clearly deathcore as they "incorporate" death metal!--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Parkway Drive show absolutly no signs of being deathcore. They're just metalcore that has really heavy breakdowns. the rest sounds to me like metalcore. if IKTPQ aren't on the list then Parkway Drive definatly shouldn't be. 8:50, 22 July 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.141.184 (talk)

Please read WP:OR. If there is a source provided for any given band, then they stay on the list. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

The band had no source or link, so it was removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.142.213 (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Merge

I just created a list of metalcore bands article, and this one is sort of redundant w/ that article. So I say we merge the two articles, taking the bands from this page and adding them to the list of metalcore bands page. Prepare to be Mezmerized! :D 02:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

why? they are two completely different genres of music. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.143.172.44 (talk) 01:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Metalcore and deathcore are two separate subgenres of hardcore/crossover metal. So, no, no offense.

Betweeen the Buried and Me

Consider taking this band off the page, even with the "early work" qualifier. Their style is far too diverse, even at that time, to be pigeongholed as deathcore, and deathcore hadn't really been established as a genre(questionable as the debate may be in that regard) until much more recently.Lokri (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Impending Doom

Lokri your stupid did the article about dethcore not say that dethcore is mostly about breakdowns, growling, and pig squealing. If that doesnt say dethcore then I will find u and shake your hand.User:Multiman00 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.139.126 (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, consider removing this band, as well as changing their band page. [1] Their sound is a mix of brutal death/goregrind, with no real "core" influences. Lokri (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I have done just so for their page but I doubt their brutal death metal label on their page. I will just say death metal and grind maybe even deathgrind. One review said a "brutal" form of death metal or the like referring to brutal death metal or are they simply referring to the band as being "brutal" death metal. Maybe a clearer source can be found for that? −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ ^kaiden 03:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I also haven't found much beside that "brutal" reference you referred to. I think, however, that the most telling sign is that they refer to themselves as death in all interviews, and all influences named were death/brutal death/grind bands. I think having death metal/grindcore as their genre on their page would be the most accurate and correct. Lokri (talk) 01:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Let's leave it as that then. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ ^kaiden 01:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Well...............their new stuff is deathcore. I really don't know what to categorize them in their early stuff.--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Underoath

Really? 68.53.81.235 (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Not there current stuff, and i wouldn't even call there old stuff deathcore either, someone should look into it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.37.8 (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Yup this is the early deathcore music. There is clearly metalcore and death metal influences there. Only their first two CDs though.--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Divine Heresy?!?

Divine Heresy is definatly not Deathcore, they don't have breakdowns, therefore there is no core influence

I added Carnifex, and I also added After The Burial —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.244.145 (talk) 03:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Divine Heresy should have the deathcore tag taken out of there page and off this page, they arn't deathcore. Listen to metalcore bands like kse etc and compare them with DH, you'll see that DH is metalcore, not deathcore. - ben —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.37.8 (talk) 15:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

they aren`t deathcore at all,there screamo cause a such a punk voice that he`s got with all the punk influence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.98.18.197 (talk) 00:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

yea a fuckin screamo band (post-hardcore) is gonna use double bass and u really think dino and joe r gonna be in a screamo band there firsst album is metalcoreish/deathcorish and there 2nd one is molodic death metal (Seth4000 (talk) 17:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC))

Band that should be on

Come on put on As I Lay Dying, Waking the cadaver. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DABANANAMUFFIN (talk • contribs) 23:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Are you retarded? aild are metalcore!!, waking the cadaver is gore/grind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.37.8 (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Wakinig The Cadaver Is Deathcore! Not Grind!!!--DABANANAMUFFIN (talk) 17:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

No... Waking the Cadaver is Grind.--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I believe a worthwhile add would be Here Comes the Kraken. I have found this page very useful in scoping out new music. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.45.255.67 (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

TDWP

I added TDWP Because they seem Deathcore.--DABANANAMUFFIN (talk) 17:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

You just don't add bands that just "seem" deathcore, do your research and add references okay. We need evidence!!! Find an article that states they are deathcore, and then add TDWP okay.--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

how about who cares? why does every band need a genre? cant we just listen to what makes our ears tingle and all be happy? - todd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.101.123.222 (talk) 04:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia was made to broadcast the media's thoughts and if they say this band is this genre we go ahead and label the band in this way. I understand that you just want your music to just be "your music" but bands are often assigned to a genre (or genres). It's just the way it is. FireCrystal (talk) 04:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

THESE BANDS ARE NOT DEATHCORE

Heaven Shall Burn : Metalcore Not Deathcore Divine Heresy : Death Metal I Killed Prom Queen : Metalcore Underoath : Post Hardcore, The old Stuff is Metalcore not Deathcore The Acacia Strain : Metalcore, Moshcore Emmure : Metalcore, Moshcore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.83.11.252 (talk) 04:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Waking The Cadaver Is Not Gore/Grind is Deathcore Band

1. Early heaven Shall Burn IS deathcore.
2. Divine Heresy is metalcore
3. I Killed the Prom Queen is only considered deathcore on their latest album. The early stuff is definitely metalcore.
4. Underoath was deathcore in the first two albums. No denying that!!!
5. The Acacia Strain is Deathcore!!!
6. Emmure is also Deathcore, but with alot more hardcore influences!!!

Accept the fact that these bands are deathcore okay.--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Oceano!

How can you have a list of ≥“°÷deathcore bands an not add Oceano they are a pretty reconigzed deathcore act and i see them no where on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathcorefan60 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

If a band doesn't have an article they don't belong on any list. It doesn't matter how notable they could be. Their article may be created at Oceano (band) if someone decides to but that means the band must pass band notabilty for inclusion to Wikipedia before it's created. FireCrystal (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Molotov Solution? and BDM

First of all, I think that Molotov Solution merits themselves to be added to this list. They are pretty clear-cut deathcore. Anyone agree with me?

And second of all, why do people think Black Dahlia Murder should keep being added back on this list? I think we can come to the conclusion that they do not fall into the "deathcore" genre of metal. They lack the radical tempo changes and breakdowns of hardcore to compliment their death/melodic death sound to be considered deathcore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meatface 91 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry but your statements are original research which is not appreciated here at Wikipedia. Sourcing reliable sources and verifiability are the ways of Wikipedia. If they are reliably sourced then they will stay regardless of what you think is right. No opinions allowed. FireCrystal (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Interesting note - the source provided for TBDM said nothing about their supposed deathcore status. --LordNecronus (talk) 02:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

We Are the End

Someone should make a article for the band "We Are the End" Because they are a pretty reconigzed deathcore band and they should be added on the List of deathcore bands.

Deathcre Ala Frenchie

Someone needs to add Pitbulls in the Nursery. They have no article but they are mentioned in the Black Lotus Records page.C (talk) 22:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Be bold. Create the article. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 16:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Alright people a lot of these bands are really good but i'd have to say that The Red Shore (TRS)crew is one of the best out there. In their one song 'Flesh Couture' there is 9 seconds of the fastest double base I have ever heard in my life. It almost sounds as fast as an uzi spraying. By the way im going to have to say that Bring Me The Horizion is NOT a deathcore band and I also agree that they are a pretty terrible band —Tyler DiGuardi

Caliban

What the f..ck Caliban do in the list of the deathcore bands MMMMMmmmm? --79.134.24.253 (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Because a paid professional says so.--3family6 (talk) 21:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

It's just one poseur metalcore band with 95% breakdowns in songs. In what song they play deathcore? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.134.24.253 (talk) 22:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I've never even heard of the band until now, but they are supported by a reliable source, which is the final say on Wikipedia. If you have a reliable source that says Caliban isn't deathcore, than the band can be removed from the list, but otherwise, they stay.--3family6 (talk) 23:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

http://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Caliban/9547 "Genre: Metalcore"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliban_%28band%29

"Caliban are a five-piece metalcore band from Germany.[1] They have released seven studio albums to-date, and two split albums with the band Heaven Shall Burn." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.201.199.151 (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is never, ever, a reliable source for other Wikipedia articles, and Metal Archives is user generated with no professional editorial staff. Please read WP:RS.--3family6 (talk) 13:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

And what source can you show where says that Caliban is a deathcore band? Did you ever listen Caliban? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.201.199.151 (talk) 15:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

This is the source cited in the list: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/p555047 Until this discussion, I'd never even heard of the band, so no, I've never listened to them. I'm not a music expert anyway, so my opinion means nil.--3family6 (talk) 16:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

If you are not music expert why you say that Caliban is a deathcore? It' look like I say that Michael Jackson is an NSBM singer and Varg Vikirnes play Christianic Black Metal or Skrewdriver play pop punk with Green Day from Russia and Ian Stuart is niger

"and Metal Archives is user generated with no professional editorial staff" oh really? All users of Metal Archives know about metal music more than you, or they must to be christianic pool shit and say that poseur primitive band from Germany, founded in 1997 "Caliban" is DEATHCORE? AHhaahaahhahaha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.21.10.26 (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Please be careful with your responses, they could be considered personal attacks, and they definitely are not very civil. I am not saying that Caliban is deathcore, Eduardo Rivadavia calls them that, and he is a professional music writer who has made extensive contributions to one of the biggest and most widely used music databases, Allmusic. And I did not add Caliban, I only reverted your unexplained edit that removed them. As for your second point, I'm sure that most of the users of Metal Archives know more about heavy metal music than I do, but the database is still user generated without a professional editorial staff (professional meaning paid or a had a book published). And finally, even if Metal Archives was reliable, all that would do is establish that the band is also metalcore (which deathcore is a fusion genre with, by the way), and it would not mean that Caliban is not deathcore. To say that Caliban is not deathcore, you need a reliable source saying they aren't. Please remember, Wikipedia runs on sources, not opinions or our own ideas.--3family6 (talk) 13:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Politics

How is politics relevant to this list? Take a look at WP:FLAGICON. This is just a permutation on flags, without actually using them, they are identifying the origin of the band or the origin of the majority band members, which isn't clear, because some bands have members from many different polities, in this case, using countries. How is this a defining characteristic of these bands? How is it a characteristic they have in common, if there is no standard/inclusion criteria?Curb Chain (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

It is very clearly not WP:FLAGICON. It also has nothing to do with politics. It does however at quick glance give the reader an indication of the global geographical popularity of specific musical subgenres. It is as relevant to the list as the date of formation of the bands. There has long been consensus to include nationalities on the metal music lists, so you just turning up and unilaterally deciding to overturn this consensus may be seen as disruptive, and possibly pointy. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

I mentioned it is a permutation on flags. It is identical to having flags, but in a text form. It does not give a "quick glance" of "popularity" and to assert such is violating WP:HEADWP:NPOV.Curb Chain (talk) 21:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Dr. Acula and In the Midst of Lions

Anyone want to add them? I hate running on to a list and adding stuff randomly. Figured I'd ask and see if anyone wants to add them first DCcomicslover (talk) 20:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover

You'll need sources. Jesusfreak is a webzine, and hence fails WP:RS. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

JesusFreakHideout is not exactly a webzine, more just a website. It is now self-published, but used to be published by Sparrow Records. Anyway, it is considered acceptable. I asked on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard about a year ago, and they were fine with it. Here is a link to that discussion. Also, even if it is a webzine, it is only biographies of living persons that have an explicit ban on webzines. --¿3family6

_contribs 13:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit: I am assuming Sparrow Records because of the deadlink to that site. Whoever added that link failed to fully reference it, which now makes it questionable.--¿3family6 _contribs 17:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Not at all. Self-published sources, including most webzines fail WP:RS epically, and as such are not used for genre. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Whilst I'm here, I'm not 100% certain about the solitary response on the reliable Sources Noticeboard. Is there any direct evidence about the connection with Sparrow Records? It's not mentioned on the Jesus Freak Hideout WP article. If they were, that would certainly count as content published by an independent, third party source, and we could use any material published during the period of affiliation. Having a "staff" isn't enough, if they're not professional journalists. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Case in point... the author of the article (one Michael Weaver) lists his occupation on the website as "law enforcement sergeant"; he's not a professional journalist, he's a random joe with an opinion and an Internet connection, until someone shows me where exactly he's been published. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey thanks for that dude! DCcomicslover (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover

The staff are professional, though whether they are paid I don't know. That might not be their main line of work, but they are officially part of the website's staff. Wikipedia policy says that with sites that are user generated, there is "the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users." JesusFreakHideout is largely staff-created, but I think that the spirit of the policy applies here. The site has strict editorial oversight, and makes sure the reader can distinguish between user reviews and actual staff reviews. There is also treatment of the site as a legitimate review source in at least three different sources: Two CMSpin news posts [2], [3]; a mention in Christian Post [4]; and a mention in Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music [5]. Beyond that, to automatically rule out a source just because it is self-published is a bit arbitrary. In the case of JFH, it is a well-developed, high-quality website that deals with numerous subjects, industries, and ministries related to Christian music, and so it should be examined on its merits. Wikipedia's guidelines are not hard rules, just general policy, and so there are always exceptions.--¿3family6 _contribs 22:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

If they're not paid, they are de facto not professional journalists. I'm prepared to accept this site as passing WP:RS if it can live it up to standard criteria; it's not at all arbritrary. You cite "credentialed members of the site's editorial staff" - the key word there is "credentialed". Can you point towards said credentials? Where their work has been published in independent, third-party sources? If not they are simply organised amateurs, and comprehensively fails WP:RS. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

All those mentions of the site are trivial. I now call into question its notability, as well as its reliability. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Right now, the consensus is that it is reliable and notable: Wikipedia:CCM/S#Jesus Freak Hideout. You should probably challenge it on that page or the RS noticeboard.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:57, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I've put it up on the reliable sources noticeboard, I'll see what they say.--¿3family6 _contribs 18:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Request of merge

Both this article and the deathcore article are kinda short, couldn't they be merged, if they were the same as the Technical Death Metal article this would be more informative 86.168.134.121 (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

As a comment on this suggestion, avant-garde metal has a similar structure as well, which would be a good way to do it. Jonjonjohny (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm assuming the comment by Jonjonjohny here is sarcastic?--¿3family6 _contribs 19:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes Jonjonjohny (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Don't understand the sarcasm sorry, I personally don't see the need for two very short articles about a small underground genre Syxxpackid420 (talk) 13:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I think I miss-understood the original comment, so the sarcasm might actually be Jonjonjohny's "yes" response to my queries about sarcasm.--¿3family6 _contribs 20:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Seriously, that might be a good idea.--¿3family6 _contribs 13:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

You know, after finding this discussion again I now realised how much of a dick I was with my statement, I'm sorry. In seriousness I am for the merge. I seriously consider this should match avant-garde metal's structure rather than this table. As me and 3family6 discussed on the List of melodic death metal bands' talk page about how these tables aren't very good for lists of bands. I have added a merge request template to kickstart it, I would transfer it onto the Deathcore page myself, but we probably should get consensus first. The discussion should probably take place on deathcore's article. Jonjonjohny (talk) 22:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok cool sorry for OP under IP address had forgotten to log in Syxxpackid420 (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Mendeed, The Agonist???

What's up with that, they're both metalcore, not deathcore at all. --93.137.169.30 (talk) 22:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

They are deathcore according to Allmusic, which fits Wikipedia's criteria of reliable sources.--¿3family6 _contribs 21:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

wish you guys would play fair when someone adds a sourced band.........

So whats going on here? i added In Dying Arms and even put a source for their entry on the page (http://www.barebonesmusic.com/barebonesmusic/news/Entries/2010/9/26_Interview_with_IN_DYING_ARMS.html) but then my addition got removed? Whats up with that? It's sourced isnt it? I was only trying to add to the list — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.233.3.151 (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Because the source you gave is unreliable. Wikipedia doesn't allow just any website as a source, they have to meet certain criteria. Please read the wiki page on reliable sources. Thanks for wanting to contribute, hopefully you can find a better source.--¿3family6 _contribs 12:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Also the band will need to have their own article to be added to a list otherwise they are not notable Syxxpackid420 (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

…And by the looks of things if they stayed signed to Matchless, I don't think they'll ever have an article on here. So my word on things: just wait until they're bigger before adding them to this list. • GunMetal Angel 07:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)