User talk:DCcomicslover

Welcome!

Hello, DCcomicslover, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as In the Midst of Lions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Davnor (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of In the Midst of Lions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on In the Midst of Lions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Davnor (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Belle Epoque (Metal Band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Belle Epoque (Metal Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 07:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting

Hi. I see you're relatively new. Welcome to Wikipedia! I was reading a discussion you were participating in (about a week and a half ago) and you weren't using any form of indented replies. You might be interested in reading wp:indentation. It's easier to read discussions when you respond to people by indenting one level further than they did. There are some examples on the link above. See also Help:Using talk pages#Indentation. Hope that helps. Killiondude (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fact that you are reading me discusssions is a tad creepy but oh well. : ) Like this?DCcomicslover (talk) 18:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover[reply]

Well, you have to assume that with an active userbase of several thousand (if not in the hundreds of thousand) users your comments are going to be read at some point. :) And yes, you're starting to get the hang of indenting. Killiondude (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skillet reply

Nice work. Two sources should be enough to handle any WP:UNDUE argument. Personally, I thought just one was good, but I was trying to follow consensus. Glad you found something.--3family6 (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MMF Christoan band refs.

I'm putting those I find her for easy access. I feel a little nerdy starting my own topic. DCcomicslover (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover http://highwiredaze.com/memphisint.htm[reply]

http://www.101distribution.com/article/Memphis-May-Fire-092309

Deletion of Society's Finest

It was tagged as not notable by User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, as you want to improve it, I've userfied it for you at User:DCcomicslover/Society's Finest. You might want to check through WP:BAND before considering a move back to article space. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah... I didn't realize it was that crappy. Sweerness. Thank you for doing that for me. Ill start my work on it soon. DCcomicslover (talk) 23:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Dccomicslover[reply]

List of Christian hardcore bands

Thanks for the help with the cleanup, but just so you know, grunge is a hardcore/metal/indie rock fusion (per several reliable sources), so grunge bands belong on the list the same way metalcore bands do. Other than that, thanks for your help and keep up the good work.--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 03:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They may have basis as that but they are completelly differant. Core music relies on a speedy tempo, occasional blast beats and ausually a down tuned guitar. I'm a die hard Core msic listener. I know my stuff. I guess I'll ave to hop into the debate now... sigh. And my wikibreak was going so well. DCcomicslover (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)DCcomicslover[reply]

Merry Christmas!

¿3family6 _contribs is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Wishing you a happy holiday! Thank you for all you contributions.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for article review: I Am Empire

I recently moved a userspace draft for I Am Empire to the mainspace and need someone other than me to review it and make sure everything is fine. Care to do the honors?--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 05:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just did! I haven't removed the template yet. Looks good. The history section may need some expansion, for you know, tours and stuff. Other than that it looks good! DCcomicslover (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)DCcomicslover[reply]

Symphonic or not - BETRAYING THE MARTYRS

The band is definetely symphonic in my opinion, there's tons of orchestration on most of the songs, this is not just deathcore or metalcore, the keys are in my opinion really important to help define the what btm sounds like. It's not whitechapell, it's closer to bands like septic flesh, flesghgod apocalypse... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.158.210.192 (talk) 09:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to deny they have some symphonic eements in their songs. But to label them orchestral or symphonic metal is to put them in the same class as... like epica. They have some elements of such but that's not their genre. Thanks for discussing this on here by the way DCcomicslover (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)DCcomicslover[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Request for comment on Talk:List of Christian metal bands

Me and 3family6 are trying to decide how best to break the list up by subgenre, similar to what I did on the punk and hardcore lists. I'm looking to add more perspectives to the conversation, so perhaps you could stop by and opinionate on it if you ever get the chance?--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of In the Midst of Lions

The article In the Midst of Lions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A disbanded band, which appears to lack WP:NMUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of In the Midst of Lions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In the Midst of Lions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Midst of Lions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I am One of Many (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]