Talk:De la capăt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chihciboy (talk · contribs) 12:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. Chihciboy (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chihciboy: Any updates on this? Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cartoon network freak:. Yes Here we go:

Infobox

Composer field is missing
Run-time field is missing
Producer field (Based on the liner notes, is Metropolitan) is missing
You can move the Music video link at the bottom of the infobox

The parametres are missing since we have different versions of the song, and adding something there would confuse the reader. Also the producer is unknown, and there are multiple videos for all versions of the song, thus it won't be linked. Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's okay, then.

Lead

Consider rephrasing "children left behind by parents who work abroad" to "for children whose parents have left them behind to work abroad."
link "migrant worker" to "parents" or "work abroad"
Oberservers → Observers
Move "Observers have compared the track to "I Could Sing of Your Love Forever" (1995) by Delirious?." to the second paragraph for consistency, just before "it won..."
Italicize (Way of the Danube) since it is a registered English title.

Done Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Background and Composition

Consider including an audio clip?

I actually don't think it's needed here. There's nothing that a sample would help the reader to understand about the song more than it's already written about here. Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine with me.

In Vienna

Alt parameter missing in image

Done Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Consider replacing Music video link to Metrolyrics link?
Include categories: Songs about children, Songs about loneliness

Done Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

On hold for 7 days — Just a few tweaks and it's good to go. Chihciboy (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chihciboy: Thanks for your review! I have responded to your comments... Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Congrats, @Cartoon network freak:. Chihciboy (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]