Jump to content

Talk:Dayne Ogilvie Prize

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dayne Ogilvie Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi our team has decided to try and expand this article as part of a edit-a-thon challenge. We are thinking of adding sections that look at the awards reception, growth and impact on public consciousness. Here is a link to our sandbox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cultleader14/sandbox we welcome any comments or feedback.Mkerceg (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd really be very surprised if you could actually find proper reliable sourcing for the content you're suggesting. Sure, all of the expected major news outlets publish an article each year when the winner is announced, but there really aren't any sources out there analyzing public reaction to or reception of it at all, the way there is for the Gillers or the GGs — trust me, I've looked for that kind of sourcing in the past and it simply isn't out there. I'd suggest you go with one of your other ideas, because you're just not going to find the sourcing needed for what you're suggesting in this case. Bearcat (talk) 03:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dayne Ogilvie Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]