Talk:Day 5: 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of minor characters in 24#Diane Huxley|Diane Huxley]]
[[List of minor characters in 24#Derek Huxley|Derek Huxley]] Anchor List of minor characters in 24#Derek Huxley links to a specific web page: Derek Huxley.
[[List of minor characters in 24#Evelyn Martin|Evelyn Martin]]
[[Minor government agents in 24#Spenser Wolff|Spenser Wolff]]
[[List of minor characters in 24#Walt Cummings|Walt Cummings]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Merge

Even though this was one of the more notable 24 episodes, there were very few episodes that were independently notable. It might be best to merge the content into 24 (season 5). Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 07:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, but nonetheless, it's part of an individual effort over at WikiProject Television to make articles for award-winning episodes (or "historical episode) for television series. (Check the templates, and you'll see that this one received two separate wins for directing) and to increase good article nominees for episodes.Penny Lane's America (talk) 07:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at WT:TV and I saw mention of creating season articles, but not episode ones. Could you point them out? Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 09:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the talkpage, not the main article. For reference, look at the sections titled "Historic Drama Episodes" and "Reformatting Emmy Awards writing and directing templates". Penny Lane's America (talk) 21:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But there needs to be consistency here. Having a small handful of articles on episodes will do one of two things, either create a lot of redlinks (as few episodes would be notable enough to have an article) or lead to the creation of an article for every episode, leading to excess cruft. I think encompassing the information into the season articles would be the better route to take here. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 22:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For this TV series there may never be an interest in developing articles for every episode. However, specific episodes that have encyclopedic content should be created. In this case, there are a few selected episodes that have won or been nominated for the most prestigious episode awards that there are. WP needs articles for them to fill in redlinks for award articles. Take for example this episode. An article is needed for it at Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Directing for a Drama Series, 58th Primetime Emmy Awards, Directors Guild of America Awards 2006, Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directing – Drama Series, Template:DirectorsGuildofAmericaOutstandingDirectingDramaSeries 1990–2009, and Template:EmmyAward DirectingDrama 2001–2025. Episodes that are in demand to fill redlinks in locations like this should be created. By mere explanation of their accolades the articles have encyclopedic merit. Much of the information can be repeated in places such as 24 (season 5) and List of 24 episodes, but they can not be fully explained at those locations. In addition, often times, these types of episode articles will complement a few other critically acclaimed episode articles to make a season article look very good. They also are useful in the articles of the writers and directors who won or were nominated for the awards.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A great example of why the award-winning and -nominated episodes should be created can be seen at Mad_Men_(season_2)#Accolades. There are four mentioned episodes in that season. Although most episodes have not been created, that would be a great set of selected episodes to work on.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 09:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. An article for Day_7:_7:00pm-8:00pm would also be worth creating, as there was quite a bit of coverage in reliable sources on the White House break in. They're listed at the 24 project. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 08:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Day 5: 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225033421/http://www.cinemaaudiosociety.org/pdf/CASQuarterlyWinter2007.pdf to http://www.cinemaaudiosociety.org/pdf/CASQuarterlyWinter2007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]