Talk:Daviesia devito

A fact from Daviesia devito appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that devito and schwarzenegger are two Australian peas?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daviesia devito.

Wikipedia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Daviesia devito is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that devito and schwarzenegger are two Australian peas? Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-28/twin-plants-named-after-arnold-schwarzenegger-danny-devito/8477576

Alt1... that in the film Twins, the stars were not two peas in a pod, but now devito and schwarzenegger are?

Created by Gderrin (talk). Self-nominated at 07:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Review in progress. Victuallers (talk) 10:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Victuallers. I'm not sure the names should be capitalised though - the article is not about the actors, but Daviesia devito and D. schwarzenegger. However, I'm happy to defer to anyone more knowledgeable about DYK than I am. Gderrin (talk) 11:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I added an alt but its not up to me to approve it. Victuallers (talk) 11:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles are new and neutral. There is a free image but not included the the hooks. Obviously the two articles describe two very similar plants and there is some common text but maybe enough to establish 1500 chars each. Is there an exemption from QPQ? Victuallers (talk) 11:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No reply. Have to assume there is an exemption based on @Gderrin:'s archives. Victuallers (talk) 08:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A QPQ is needed since the nominator has more than five DYK credits, as shown here. DanCherek (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - I've only nominated one article (Veronica perfoliata) and thought that was the criterion. I'll sort the QPQ as soon as I work out how it's done. Gderrin (talk) 18:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Victuallers, DanCherek, Gderrin, the rules recently changed so that rather than credits, DYK is counting nominations (or nominated articles) only. So despite the large number of credits, there is only the one nomination to date. After this, it will be three—I believe we're counting nominated articles rather than nominations, but I'm a bit unclear on that given how often it was updated during the recent rule change. ~~Victuallers, can you please continue your review?~~ Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification BlueMoonset and apologies for my mistaken comment, Gderrin. DanCherek (talk) 23:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

I believe this needs an actual reviewer? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlapping text but considered long enough as both are over 1500 chars. Refs are there including for the hook. (Alt1 needs a review due to COI). Its neutral and the hook is hooky. Sorry for the delay. Nice articles. Victuallers (talk) 08:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P1