Talk:David Lloyd (botanist)

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Thanks to Gadfium for starting the article. Capitalistroadster 02:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gadfium, does Stephanie know more about this? I was only 12 at the time of the trial, but people still talk about it today. It made a huge impact on the science community, especially many people knew him personally. Onco_p53 03:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's lots of information on the trial in the second ref I gave should anyone want to expand the article. I think we should be careful that the article doesn't become 99% about the trial. I gather his work was sufficiently important to justify an article about him, and I don't want that to get lost. Stephanie knows no more than this, although she did sit next to Vicki Calder at a conference once.-gadfium 03:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]