This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Which says, "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article"... being nominated for a major award, which has its own section in the body of the article is pretty much the definition of what should be included in the lead. Onel5969TT me03:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And before you throw about terms like WP:OWN, you really should understand them. Might I suggest you pay particular attention to WP:OAS? As well as WP:OWNBEHAVIOR? It would be one thing if I was simply reverting without leaving a summary. Or if I was simply disagreeing with your edit. However, your edits have no basis in policy or guidelines, as I have clearly shown. In fact, they contravene the guidelines regarding wp:lead. Your canard about "FA articles not having this type of content" has been shown to be patently false. And you continue to refuse to engage on the talk page. Hmmm.... who's showing tendencies of WP:OWN? Your arguments boil down to a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Might I suggest you refrain from these types of edits in the future?Onel5969TT me11:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
