Jump to content

Talk:David A. Schlissel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David A. Schlissel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability, fails WP:BIO

[edit]

On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life. I have looked at the previous discussion, but I don't understand how one NYT mention is sufficient. Crossed self-reference between antinuclearists, one that recalls the other ? Eight works, one dead link and one CV at the employee site. --Robertiki (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the article does not demonstrate notability as it stands. But there does appear to be a lot of info on the web which could be used to change that (eg., [1] [2]).—Preceding unsigned comment added by--Johnfos (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]