Talk:David & Charles
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David & Charles article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
United States
[edit]Why is this tagged with {{US-publish-company-stub}}
when, so far as is known, Devon has not seceded from the UK and floated across the pond? If {{UK-publish-company-stub}}
is unsuitable because of the US parent organisation, wouldn't {{Publish-company-stub}}
be more appropriate? --Redrose64 (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- They're US-owned since 2000. Not much sign of US influence, but "following the money" suggests that including under US categorizations is appropriate. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Devon articles
- Low-importance Devon articles
- WikiProject Devon articles
- Start-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions