Jump to content

Talk:Darth Maul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:08, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 September 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Closed: withdrawn without any additional support. (non-admin closure) kennethaw88 • talk 18:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Darth Maul → Maul (Star Wars) – The character is known as simply Maul in Rebels, The Clone Wars, and comics. I believe that Maul is the more common name over Darth Maul in every instance since the character was brought back for The Clone Wars, and thus the article should probably be moved per the common name policy. Unnamed anon (talk) 02:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As the original and so far only person who wants to move this page, I Withdraw this request. Unnamed anon (talk) 18:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 15 March 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED - Red Slash 21:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darth Maul → Maul (Star Wars) – Primary sources such as Clone Wars and Rebels have primarily called him just Maul since 2012, but a lot of secondary sources have stuck with the old name since he had a 15 year absence from the series and was known as Darth Maul before and during that absence, and maybe because the new name is barely different from the old one. I'd argue that Darth Maul is no longer his WP:COMMONNAME anymore due to primary sources just using Maul, and to whoever wishes to say that Darth Maul is still his COMMONNAME, I'd like to hear why instead of just giving the policy as a reason when currently primary sources have changed the COMMONNAME. Should COMMONNAME be given more weight on the primary sources that give the material existence or the secondary sources that give it notability? Unnamed anon (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palpatine is a good point of reference for this. We use the secondary-source preference, not the name he was introduced with or his 'true' in-universe names. UpdateNerd (talk) 06:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Palpatine is still constantly referred to by that name by other characters, even in the sequel trilogy. However, while I don't think Maul has been referred to with Darth in any official Star Wars material since his death was retconned, I appreciate your answer for secondary source preference, which does still use Darth Maul. I do want to bring up Grogu, whose page was his official name "The Child" instead of his colloquial name "Baby Yoda" prior to his name reveal, but ultimately Maul and Darth Maul are such similar names that I'm fine if the page stays as is, though I'd still like to keep this discussion open for a bit. Unnamed anon (talk) 08:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since Grogu's name reveal, most people know him by that. No one called him "The Child" except in-universe. Maul's debut role as the main villain of The Phantom Menace is far more notable than the animated series or spin-off movie featuring him. Until the secondary sources change, there isn't a reason to drop "Darth" from the article name. See also Darth Vader, whose backstory has been expansively developed under the Anakin Skywalker identity, which Vader eventually returns to; however, his villainous role is still more commonly known. UpdateNerd (talk) 08:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I actually believe Palpatine is a good example as to why this article should be renamed to simply "Maul". Secondary sources rarely refer to Palpatine as simply "Palpatine"; he is more commonly referred to as either "Emperor Palpatine" or "Darth Sidious". Yet, because the character did not spend the entirety of his tenure in the Star Wars canon as The Emperor, his Wikipedia article is simply named "Palpatine" as it more accurately represents his role in the franchise as a whole (and not just the Original Trilogy). I would also argue that Maul's role in The Clone Wars and Rebels are more significant than his appearance in The Phantom Menace, which did very little to establish Maul as an individual character. Even starwars.com now lists the character as "Maul" in his designated character biography. JokEobard (talk) 05:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maul did have a bigger role in the clone wars and rebels, but the phantom menace is what made him notable enough to return in the first place, and his most famous appearance. I think a good compromise would be to keep the page name as his most famous name (Darth Maul), but at the very least mention in the first sentence and infobox that some material just calls him Maul. Of course, prose referring to certain material should use Darth Maul when referring to TPM and just Maul when referring to TCW and Rebels. Unnamed anon (talk) 07:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point and I'd agree with that compromise. The article's name should remain "Darth Maul", but the first sentence should start off with "Maul, formerly Darth Maul, is..." given that the character has been officially credited as the former in far more Star Wars projects than the latter. This would more accurately represent the character's status in the franchise since renouncing his Sith title was such a large part of Maul's arc following The Clone Wars and during Rebels. JokEobard (talk) 08:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted this change because we shouldn't portray some works as being 'present' and others as 'past'. As it concerns Palpatine, "The Emperor" wouldn't make sense because he didn't occupy that role throughout his also-famous portrayal in the prequel trilogy. "Darth Sidious" is an in-universe moniker which would make sense for Wookieepedia, as is the case with "Maul". But we need to respect both primary and secondary sources in a sensible way, without pandering to fandom. Going by viewership, many people watched the mainstream episodic films without ever seeing the more fan-centric animated series; it'd be difficult to prove that the reverse is (more significantly) true. UpdateNerd (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

He’s a very well known character, like Grievous, Vader, and Palpatine.

[edit]

Could someone please put a lock for non-logged in users to prevent vandalism? 2600:1702:46A8:D70:B80E:A45:34C1:31A8 (talk) 13:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think it also needs to be protected. Jaxbarina (talk) 22:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assertion of notability

[edit]

Hi, I've opened a discussion at the Star Wars WikiProject regarding articles having few or no citations asserting notability, and I invite any interested editors to participate and help rectify this issue. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Darth_Maul&oldid=1232454714"