Talk:Danks' Rangers

Military history: British / European / North America / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Scalping

To be clear, I so appreciate your work on the Gorham Rangers and Dank Rangers pages - they are impressive in detail and fill in an important part of the regions military history.

The French were not only interested in native scalps - they paid for British scalps as the record books in Louisbourg indicate. The British only paid for native scalps, in part, because the mi'kmaq were the military power in the region - not the Acadians. Both sides (natives and europeans) expressed dismay at the barbarity of the other sides atrocities (i.e., killing non-combatants). Super-imposing 20th century terms like genocide, ethnic cleansing or even racism does not help illuminate the complexity of the 17th-18th century warfare. At the least, such assertions need to be referenced.--Hantsheroes (talk) 09:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]