This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is heavily biased and is presented as though it were an entry about a person when in reality it is almost totally devoted to the vilification of the state of Israel. For example, it presents the organization that calls itself the "Palestinian Centre for Human Rights" as if it were a bona fide human rights organization when it reality it is a political activist organization supporting one side (the Palestinians) within the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict. The article does not provide a counter-balance to the allegations in Machover's interview in The Independent that would explain why the British Government opposed Machover's attempts to harass prominent Israeli visitors to Britain. It references the Goldstone Report without mentioning that subsequently Goldstone publicly recanted the most serious allegations in his report (thus discrediting the report and those who produced it). Nor does the article mention that subsequently the British Parliament did alter the law so that it now prevents Machover and his ilk from taking advantage of British law to further their own political agendas, by requiring the approval of the attorney general before arrest warrants can be issued. There are other examples of prejudice and bias throughout the article. This entry should be either completely rewritten in an impartial manner or removed from wikipedia. (85.250.78.83 (talk) 08:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC))[reply]
Soosim, please explain how removing content that is present in the source cited, Terror police feared gun battle with Israeli general, in this edit is "closer to what the source says". It removes pertinent information, actually the main points in the article about this case, that are present in the source. The resulting content is therefore surely further rather than closer to what the source cited says. Did you read the source ? Your edit summary is either an error or a misrepresentation. Please tell me it was an error and that you will restore the content or at least provide a plausible explanation for its removal. Also, NGO Monitor are not a reliable source for claims about BLPs, period. The EL must be removed. Sean.hoyland - talk11:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
this article is about machover, not about those "main points" as you call them. the edit is neither an error nor a misrepresentation. we have wikilinks and other links to direct people to more information about topics discussed in an article. i will change the EL to FR. thanks. Soosim (talk) 12:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
