Jump to content

Talk:Daniel J. Boorstin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Guy Debord was not a post-modernist... He was a situationist...

Noted and corrected. Feel free to make such changes yourself too. Wikipedia is for all to edit! Also please sign your comments with four tildes so we know who is who. Inoculatedcities 17:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did Daniel J. Boorstin write This Beats Working For A Living: The Dark Secrets Of A College Professor using the alias "Professor X"?--76.83.249.234 00:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuit

[edit]

The following text was removed from the main article because there is no indication of the sources from which this material is taken.

"According to some former employees, verbal abuse was common while he was chief librarian. In two separate lawsuits, three plaintiffs who worked with Boorstin claimed they endured verbal and sexual misconduct and innuendo and an environment in which women did not feel safe. Those cases were later dismissed. Boorstin was sued in 1975 for plagarism in a case that was later thrown out of court. Plaintiff Kevin Weldon was later convicted of fraud and sentenced to 10 years in jail.

Arguably, the material could be restored -- but appropriate in-line citations would be needed, at a minimum. In my view, the fact that these lawsuits were denied by the courts seems significant. If the courts found no merit in these complaints, why should this Wikipedia article give them greater credence? I'm skeptical about this entire section ..., but I suppose we should remain open to the possibility that there might be verifiable references which will help us to see these otherwise unsubstantiated allegations in a different light> --Ooperhoofd (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reith Lectures

[edit]

In 1975 Daniel Boorstin gave the Reith Lectures. His title was "America and the World Experience". Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 20:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article reclassification

[edit]

I think the article now meets the requirements for Class C. The subject should be rated as Mid importance, in large part because of his actual impacts on the operation and public perceptions of the Library of Congress. I have marked these changes here for WP:Oklahoma, and suggest that other interested projects consider the same. Bruin2 (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Daniel J. Boorstin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]