Talk:Dancheong

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dancheong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

A fact from Dancheong appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 September 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,510 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that dancheong (example pictured) refers to Korean traditional decorative coloring on wooden buildings and artifacts for style?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/September.

Wikipedia

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Uncited Info

Please remember everything put in an article must be verified by reliable sources per WP:V and WP:NOR. If you cannot find sources, then the info you insert will most likely be removed. Tommi1986 ^talk! 01:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add "{{About||Chinese Danqing|Chinese painting}}", thank you. --125.230.92.119 (talk) 11:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - This article is about Korean architecture, nothing to do with Chinese painting, this was the reason the page was protected. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 11:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstood the template!! Will add!! Sorry Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 11:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 13:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About "Dancheong" and "Danqing"

In Chinese characters, both "Danqing" and "Dancheong" are "丹青". By the way, "靑" is a variant of "青". --111.251.77.210 (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a quick reply. I think that what is happening is here (at least on this wikipedia page) is that editors want make this page dancheong distinctive from the Chinese danqing, and make the page very specific to Korean dancheong and its relation to Korean architecture painting. Both Korean and Chinese users are using the same characters (丹青 or 丹靑) and it seems that it is roughly the same thing if we are only talking about decorative painting for architecture (and/or possibly tomb murals). I think that this page is not appropriate to describe Chinese 丹青 as referring to Chinese painting in general. I believe that Japan also have their own version of dancheong (used in interior architecture), but I am unsure if they would also write it as 丹青. Anyway, these days there have been a lot of vandalism and disruptive editing and people have been discourteous to each other. My opinion on that is that if there is info about danqing (i.e. used in architecture) being equivalent to Korean dancheong (i.e. used in architecture) but with distinctive characteristics, then those info should be merged into one this page while keeping subsections for all three variant (Chinese, Korean, and Japanese). However, this wikipedia page should not refer to ancient Chinese painting in the broad term. If people are still fighting over it and want to keep it specific to Korean variant, then it might be better to make a page specific to Chinese danqing (for architecture). If there is any mistakes re:my explanation above or if more things need to be clarified or be discussed, please be courteous. Thank you. AE Aklys Erida (talk) 14:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]