Jump to content

Talk:Dance with My Father (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Similarities Christina Milian's Song

[edit]

The first 9 seconds of Christina Milian's "Until I Get Over You" sounds kinda like the first 9 second's of Dance with My Father. Could they've inspired either one or the other? (instrumental wise) 80.57.225.86 14:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Years Old

[edit]

Wow, he was really young when he lost his father. That is so sad.--Splashen (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 June 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. After relisting, it seems consensus doesn't support the move, with the main argument being a lack of there being a primary topic. (closed by a page mover) (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dance with My Father (song) → Dance with My Father – The song is the primary topic of the same name and more recognized by the base title than the album itself. If stats are necessary, here you go: the song page is more viewed than the album. The disambiguation page should be deleted, so the song can take over. George Ho (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Omni Flames (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Truth, SSTflyer: it debuted at number one; so did Monica's After the Storm the following week, pushing the other album out. I don't know why the albums debuted at number one, but that does not mean the album was the multi-platinum seller or anything like that. Also, even when the peak was higher than that, the album didn't have any other notable original tracks than the titular song; covers of oldies don't count. George Ho (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Was the salting solution a joke or something, Rich? WP:TWODABS says a disambiguation page may be suitable if there is no primary topic of just two with the same name. George Ho (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No joke, but George, are you saying the guidelines are now immutable rules? Not that I thought the "ideal solution" would fly, if we reduce the choice to two articles instead of three and both are clearly marked as to content, then nobody gets lost. If a genuine PT is created then we can RM the article. Maybe there are problems with the idea, but I am not seeing them yet. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying that we should respect that rule, even when not considered policy, Rich. I was gonna discuss enabling or disabling AutoComplete until I figured that you implicitly disregarded the primary topic proposal. If not moved (or no consensus), then the disambiguation page may (as I hate to admit) still be needed, especially for those who disabled the AutoComplete and when there is no absolute primary topic in question. Of course, you can propose a change to the rule at WT:disambiguation, but I wouldn't change one bit of it, even when I can do copy editing on it. --George Ho (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair George, I never expected anybody to take what I said said seriously. Thanks for doing that. --Richhoncho (talk) 22:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain a little more, Unreal7? TWODABS normally discourages a disambiguation page when one of the two of the same name is the primary topic, but it still allows a disambiguation page when neither of two topics is the primary topic. George Ho (talk) 22:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This IS the primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 23:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dance with My Father (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dance with My Father (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Dance with My Father (song) (redirect)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dance with My Father (song) (redirect). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 27#Dance with My Father (song) (redirect) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dance_with_My_Father_(song)&oldid=1200369829"