Jump to content

Talk:Dacia Logan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

Should this be merged with Renault Logan? —Mulad (talk) 17:39, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Flat windshield

[edit]

The wind shield is fltter not flat. This allows it to be sag bent rather than press bent, reducing investment.

I seriously doubt that the windshield is flat... I can believe that the windshield is flatter, in order to be cheaper to produce. The last production car I can remember with a flat windshield was the Fiat Panda. Anyway the windshield does not look flat on the pictures.Hektor 15:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Supermini or small family car?

[edit]

The Logan is 4.35 m long, and has a huge boot. In developing markets it is similar to the Fiat Siena, Renault Clio Sedan, Ford Fiesta Sedan, Škoda Fabia Sedan... so it is in my opinion a supermini. Small family cars are also 4.20-4.30 m long, but have a larger inner space, smaller boot and more powerful engines, let alone material qualities. NaBUru38 - March 13 2006, 18:30 UYT

Another aspect: a hatchback version is expected. If current Dacia has a 500L boot and the hatchback around 250L, it will be 30-40cm shorter, or 4.00m. That is the same as the lstest superminis - Renault Clio, Fiat Punto and Peugeot 207. NaBUru38 01:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I own a Renault Logan (I live in Colombia) and the car is a small family car. It is as big as the Chevrolet Astra or the VW polo sedan. 200.106.192.32 04:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Volkswagen Polo is also a supermini / subcompact car, and it's smaller than the Astra. More infomation: current Hyundai Accent and SEAT Córdoba are 4280 mm long, the Kia Rio 4240 mm, the Škoda Fabia Sedan 4220 mm and the Chevrolet Aveo 4310 mm [1]. All these models are superminis / subcompact cars, so the 4250 mm long Logan should also be referred to as one of them. -- NaBUru38 00:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I own a 2011 Logan MCV, and it is quite a bit larger than the Polo, Fabia and Rio; it absolutely is not a supermini. Going by actual size, I would say it should be placed in the same class as the VW Passat (which I have owned before -- the Logan has far more legroom in the rear seats and larger luggage volume). Same width as the B5 Passat, almost same length, much more interior space, and the engines available are not exactly feeble by European standards. The B5 Passat is classified as a Large Family Car or Mid-Size, so I suggest the Logan to be reclassified here, at least as Small Family Car. Going by the cars mentioned in the Compact car article, I would actually vote for a classification as Large Family car, because the Logan is more similar to those -- few compacts are offered with a 7-seater option, after all. The Logan is. 82.82.128.216 04:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Having seen the dimensions of the Logan and the Logan MCV (I own the latter and see the former frequently), I wonder whether the two models should even share the same article; the MCV is quite a bit larger in internal and external dimensions than the Logan and has a completely different layout; I think the only carry-over is the front fascia, which have been ditched in 2011. Comments? I believe these two models should have separate articles. Stizzleswick (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I borrowed a company Darcia Logan yesterday, and it turned out to be a huge 7-seater. There's no way that can be described as a small family car, I'm not even sure "large family car" adequately describes its dimensions. I understand there are many smaller models as well, so simply changing the article's description to 'large family car' wouldn't work. But it definitely needs work. My suggestion would be to change it to 'family car', and add in an explanation about the size of the different models at some later point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diadem (talk • contribs) 18:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The German articles are actually split; there are separate articles for the Logan and the Logan MCV (if my command of romance languages is good enough, so are the Romanian articles: these cars are made in Romania). Given the differences in dimensions and target market of the cars, I think it would be a good idea to split the articles in this language version accordingly. Please comment. Stizzleswick (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+to change

[edit]

section:Production production numbers are not in line, section:Marketing and marketing figures and prices have to be updated..Mion 01:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dacia logan steppe.jpg

[edit]

Image:Dacia logan steppe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting Indian Sales

[edit]

the article claims that this car has sold very well in india and is the "best selling car in it's calss, but then goes on to say that sales have been very slow selling only a few thousand units.

Dacia Sandero

[edit]

Shouldn't the Sandero, which is quite different from the Logan, have its own article ? Hektor (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-phrase and re-include

[edit]

I just removed the paragraph below from the article. Could any native speaker please rephrase this? --212.144.132.48 (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to users, this car is best value for money. Price, space, size, looks are pros of this car. While many are saying that indicator lamp in the dashboard and bonnet lever are not good, source Mouthshut.com. This is first joint venture car with Renault. The Renault Logan is the first right hand car drive from the European car maker and ofcourse its first car in India, source auto.technews.in

Engines (2019) - Logan II

[edit]

Article lists

  • 0.9 L M281 I3 turbo (petrol/LPG)
  • 1.0 L M281 I3 (petrol)

as engines, but in Poland Dacia is sold with

Matkor (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Engines (2009-2011)

[edit]

In the article, there's a 1.0 MPI mentioned. I can not find any further information about this engine though, thus it would be great, if the person who put the motor in could confirm this and maybe also link to a source. 89.245.167.108 (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is not yet on sale with the Logan in any country. Is it that it was just a rumour or a future version that has not been released yet? I don't know. 86.123.20.208 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In western Europe, a 1.0 engine was never offered; the previously offered 1.2 and 1.4 engines have been discontinued, leaving the 1.6 8v and 16v petrol/LPG/flexfuel engines and the 1.5 Diesel. Source: Dacia Germany, unfortunately the info I have includes previous versions of the page that are no longer online. --82.82.128.216 (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dacia Logan. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dacia Logan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dacia_Logan&oldid=1256529542"