Talk:Da la Vuelta

Da la Vuelta has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 17, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Latin music: Tropical music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Tropical music task force.

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Da la Vuelta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129065307/http://especiales.univision.com/contentuvn/rinconlatino/plnuestro/opinion.html to http://especiales.univision.com/contentuvn/rinconlatino/plnuestro/opinion.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Da la Vuelta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 02:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this, comments should be added soon! Kingsif (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Lead good length for article
Well written throughout, with good tone and grammar
Pass

Coverage

Lead comprehensive
The background is all about how he came to record an English-language album - the song is in Spanish and, while a promotional single for that album, there is definitely way too much coverage of the entire album process so much that I really thought text had been transplanted from the album article before I got close to the relevance.
Music and lyrics is good
Reception has good balance of detail and quotes
Needs work

Illustration

A few standard chart lists
Album cover in infobox
Fair use music clip
Pass

Neutrality

Seems fine
Pass

Stability

History looks clear
Pass

Verifiability

Sources look good
Everything cited in line
Pass

Copyright

Check looks good
Good rationale for use of song clip
Pass Kingsif (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

On hold A good portion of the article is the outside coverage of the album's arguments, which can be cut down quite a bit. Kingsif (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magiciandude: I don't think the notifications are being sent to your talkpage, so ping. Kingsif (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: I'll get to work on this either this Thursday or Friday as I'm off work those two days. Erick (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: I cut the background information and merged the release information with musical style section. Erick (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magiciandude: That's great - I think the mention of being one of the three Spanish-language records included on Marc Anthony is sufficient background, but if some background is also added, that should be fine as long as relevant. Nice.

Kingsif (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]