Talk:DOBAG Carpet Initiative

DOBAG Carpet Initiative was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 11, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 July 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Textile Arts

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DOBAG Carpet Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150220003926/http://peterlinden.com/dobagproject.html to http://www.peterlinden.com/dobagproject.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:DOBAG Carpet Initiative/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Copy changes

The copy is actually okay. Some suggestions for general improvement:

Remove comma after "antique woven carpets"
Remove comma after "cheap and easy to use"
"having a hard, metallic look," and being, "dull and dead" → remove the second and third commas
Remove comma after "in 1953"
Remove comma after "from plants"
Capitalize "Traditional" in Marmara University Department of traditional Handicraft and Design

References

There are not enough references, and some references are begging for additional information.

Some paragraphs need additional citations in their last sentences. There is one completely uncited paragraph.

References 13 through 17 are to entire websites, not specific pages. It seems the intent was to have footnotes that were more appropriate for external links. These are not references and should be in an external links section.

Images

All of the images are appropriately licensed. There might be one or two too many for the page layout. The Islamic Gallery photo may be best used as a photo opposite the lede, to show an example of the project's own work.

Other notes

There are no copyvio concerns.
The article is stable, almost too much so; the nominator made various grammar changes and then published the page.

This article generally feels underdeveloped for a GA, and I am worried that the nominator had little to do with any of its writing. HajjiBaba wrote more than 90 percent of the total prose on this page and seems to be a topic expert. The recommendations on the page will at least fix some of its larger structural issues, though I am doubtful a GA can be had. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]