Talk:DALL-E

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DALL-E article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about DALL-E. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about DALL-E at the Reference desk.

DALL-E was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2021	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 18, 2021.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the machine-learning model DALL-E, widely reported on for its "surreal" and "quirky" output, also learned to solve Raven's Matrices (a form of IQ test) without being specifically taught to do so?

Computing: Software / CompSci Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

On 17 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from DALL-E to DALL·E. The result of the discussion was Not moved.

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SG2027 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DALL-E → DALL·E – Misspelled: OpenAI has consistently referred to its image generation model as "DALL·E" without a dash in its official communications. This naming convention has been always maintained since the model's introduction, so there's no reason to change its name by using a dash. FaviFake (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per MOS:TM. The provided rationale has no relevance to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, stylism. 162 etc. (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MOS:TMRULES—blindlynx 04:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sebbog13 (talk) 00:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with BarrelProof,162 etc., and blindlynx above. I'll also point out that the first few reliable secondary sources I've checked all use a dash in the name, showing that using the dash is commonplace and supported by sources, like NPR at Surreal or too real? Breathtaking AI tool DALL-E takes its images to a bigger stage and The Guardian at From Trump Nevermind babies to deep fakes: DALL-E and the ethics of AI art. Elspea756 (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Technically DALL-E is art theft

I’m just gonna straight up say it. DALL-E and most AI image generators are art theft. The only reason they haven’t been classified as theft by any law makers is because of how new this whole AI stuff is.

AI art is theft because for starters all of these AI images generators admit they use images they got off from the internet. This Wikipedia article even says this

“DALL·E's model is a multimodal implementation of GPT-3 with 12 billion parameters which "swaps text for pixels," trained on text–image pairs from the Internet.”

Except they like to word them as “these generator learns from images posted on the internet.”

It also seems unlikely that most of the images they use are in the public domain. CycoMa1 (talk) 02:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean come on they know that their program is problematic the article even says this.

“ DALL·E 3 is designed to block users from generating art in the style of currently-living artists.” CycoMa1 (talk) 05:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It feels like this article is just giving undue weight on the matter.CycoMa1 (talk) 05:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycoMa1: The talk page is WP:NOTAFORUM. I fail to see a case for the undue weight template you added. Are you aware of reliable secondary sources discussing your concerns? WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 12:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DALL-E & DALL·E, yet again

The article is not very consistent in its formatting of the name. I'd suggest, per commoname and the above move request, that we replace all instances of DALL·E by DALL-E. Thoughts? — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 10:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

semiprotection

There were some weird invisible comments here trying to stop accidental vandalism here. They go like

This is NOT DALL-E! This is WIKIPEDIA!!

If such vandalism is a problem then the article can just be put under semiprotection. It will stop all the clueless visitors from trying to prompt Wikipedia. pony in a strange land (talk) 03:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]