Talk:DAFIF

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

anybody think a FOIA request would be effective?Scientes.bonum.et.malum (talk) 09:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FOIA requests are almost always denied for mapping products; I'm not sure what the exemption is. However thanks to some kind (or unaware) souls, DAFIF seems to regularly pop up on rogue sites and open directories if you Google intensively for them. The DAFIF AIRAC 1013 cycle (December 2010) is online right now, for example. Rolypolyman (talk) 06:59, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it considered "complete"? There are places that have airfields (for example) that aren't in DAFIF.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.115.205 (talk) 10:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Format

One would think there would be at least some clue to the format of a DAFIF file given. Jidanni (talk) 03:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The DAFIF archive has a DOC folder describing the format. --Joe Sewell (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The DAFIF data is a big directory tree, with each directory containing one or more 'tab seperated value' text files. At a guess, most people would use a tool to read this data, so the way it is stored didn't really matter to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.133.50.94 (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DAFIF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021100457/http://www.nga.mil/NGASiteContent/StaticFiles/OCR/nga0411.pdf to http://www.nga.mil/NGASiteContent/StaticFiles/OCR/nga0411.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]