Talk:Czechoslovak–Hungarian population exchange

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in Czechoslovak-Hungarian population exchange

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Czechoslovak-Hungarian population exchange's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Rieber, p. 93":

From Hungarians in Slovakia: Rieber, p. 93
From Slovakization: J. Rieber 2000, p. 93

Reference named "marko":

From Slovakization: Marko & Martinický 1995
From Hungarians in Slovakia: Marko, Martinický: Slovensko-maďarské vzťahy. 1995

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Czechoslovak–Hungarian population exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080301110413/http://www.gramma.sk/en/hunginslov/history.php to http://www.gramma.sk/en/hunginslov/history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no word about the Czechoslovak taking 100k Hungarians for slavery work to Czech land in 1946-1948. Including new-born babies and elderly people.

Czechs "sold" those Hungarians as animals on market places. Czech farmers treated them as slaves. The Czechs tries to "forget" these unhuman acts of their "democratic" Czechoslovakia. Even the post 1989 Czechoslovakia, Czech Republic rejected to give justice to these people. Czechs try to hide, forget for ever their sins against humanity on innocent people. 81.89.57.21 (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP please find some WP:Reliable sources and be the change you want to see in the world. This is the encyclopedia anyone can edit (t · c) buidhe 19:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference article 27 is absurdly biased

Reference article 27 https://web.archive.org/web/20090423112729/http://migrationeducation.de/15.1.html?&rid=14&cHash=944ca081bb has several sections that makes its validity dubious.

Few examples:

The Slovaks, willing partners in the 1938 collapse of the Czechoslovak Republic and solely responsible for the disappearance of the second Czechoslovak Republic in 1992,

76,616 Hungarians were forcibly taken to Hungary in boxcars; these Hungarians were generally well-to-do businessmen, tradesmen, farmers and intellectuals. At the same time, 60,257, mostly poverty-stricken Slovaks volunteered to move to Czechoslovakia.

Benes proceeded to erode, and then destroy, the previous harmonious coexistence of the Czech, German, Slovak and Hungarian people.

The diabolic Benes plan for the expulsion of the German and Hungarian population from their homes on former Czechoslovak territory

Slovakia miraculously emerged as an accidental beneficiary of World War II

The restoration of Czechoslovakia after World War II was a political mistake of colossal proportion.

Time has come for the peaceful revision of the Slovak-Hungarian border along centuries-old ethnic lines

As you can see, article uses clearly unprofessional words as "diabolic" or "colossal", issues multiple claims as "solely responsible for the disappearance" with no concrete or even weak proofs and it states explicitly wrong statements as "harmonious coexistence of the Czech, German, Slovak and Hungarian people".

There are many other examples I omitted for sake of time, but article in whole paints Czechoslovakia and its successor states in strongly negative light, misinterpenetrating and bending historical facts. In contrast, it paints Hungary as victim who was forced to join WW2.

As such, I think this reference should be removed. Darth Kirtap (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]