Talk:Czecho-Slovakia

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• Czechoslovakia
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Czechoslovakia
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

Czech Republic

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles

Slovakia

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles

Eastern Europe (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles

Former countries

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Why not merge?

I don't see the reason to not merge this into Czechoslovakia. It's a stub, has no sources, and doesn't have any use as a disambiguation page. The Czechoslovakia article lists the names and their etymologies, links to the Hyphen War article, and links to the various history articles. — MK (^t/_c) 09:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Despite that i am not a registered user, i agree, there is no reason for a simple alternate spelling/name to have it's own page. 66.59.49.88 (talk) 18:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]