Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Emma (2006)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Cyclone Emma)
Good articleCyclone Emma (2006) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2010Good article nomineeListed
August 31, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Retirement

[edit]

The name EMMA was retired after this use according to http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/documents/TCP-24-OP-PLN-2006-edition-english.pdf Jason Rees (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Emma Flood

[edit]

What happend to Cyclone Emma Flood, crazy drunk cat chaser? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.9.41.55 (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits, as that was not the proper title of the article. If you want to move it, you should propose it first. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't a title btw, that was an image of a person aka vandalism, you've been a bit too focused on shifting the focus of articles recently hink :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I was assuming good faith :P Leave my article shifting focus thingy out of this! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The first edit was good faith, the second one...not so much Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
True, and it'd be hard to assume the first post in this discussion as good faith unless I was a cat chaser. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cyclone Emma (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]