Talk:Customs House, South Shields

hi,

I have full permission to use the information given about the Customs House. I work at the venue and have been instructed by management to create the page.

Keir Waugh

We can't accept copyrighted material no matter what, I'm afraid. You should see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission to fix this problem, but unless the text is public domain or released under the GFDL it stays off.
I also highly suggest you read our policy on conflicts of interest. Usually if a person who works for a company has to create a page about that company, it doesn't meet our notability guideline for corporations. It is nearly always better to wait for someone not involved to create the article. Cheers. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup

As a result of the borderline deletion discussion, I have removed from the article the sentences that were a) marketing-oriented, and b) trivial information that doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia. As a result, I am removing the conflict of interest tag as I feel the remaining bits are suitably impartial, factual and encyclopaedic. I haven't yet had time to address the other issues and may not get round to doing so.

If you have any problems with me deleting these bits, please discuss it here.

Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Customs House, South Shields/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• Lead image caption "Front of the Customs House" isn't very helpful as there are two fronts, and the reader knows it's the Customs House as that's the name of the article. Per the Principle of Some Astonishment, suggest "The Italianate southwest front" or something of that sort.
  • I have changed the description to make it more specific.

• "Classical style" in the infobox: please lose the "style" as it's redundant to the attribute heading; and maybe say "Classical Italianate" to harmonise with the above, and with the sources.
  • Done.

• Is Mill Dam Conservation Area a plausible redlink, i.e. are you writing it?
  • I think it passes the notability test. There's a Character Appraisal, a Historic Environment Record entry, and a few local reports (e.g. from Durham University and South Tyneside Council. The Conservation Area contains several landmarks (including the Customs House) with Historic England entries, and the area has historical significance, e.g. The Mill Dam riots. I haven't started the article myself.

• "first opened" is a tautology.
  • Fixed.

• Custom houses aren't there to "facilitate" shipping, their function is to collect duty, which could be said to be the exact opposite...
  • I think I was going for "built as a result of the growing shipping industry", thus kind of facilitating it. I see your point though, so I have altered.

• Link Heworth to Heworth, Tyne and Wear.
  • Done.

• Hodgson p. 200 and image in 'Customs history' section mention "River Police Station" which seems to be part of the arts centre, but also seems to have been the "1878 extension" and the "Marine Board offices"? Looks as if readers will find it difficult to identify which building was and is what, so perhaps a labelled plan or more descriptive caption and accompanying cited text would be in order to explain what the buildings' functions were at each stage (at least 1863 and 1878 need detailing).
  • Thank you for spotting this. I have noticed I've made an incorrect assumption with the extension of the building. The River Police Station is a completely different building, just built next to the Customs House (it wasn't the extension). The 1878 extension is visible when looking at the building now. It was joined directly onto the original building, and there is a huge inscription saying "Board of Trade Offices" to prove this (d'oh...). You can see it here. I've also confirmed it with Siteline's handy grid references. I will amend the article to address the misunderstanding and remove references to the River Police Station as it is not relevant.

• "in an Italianate, Renaissance and Classical style". The reader may well ask "Well, which?" given that these aren't the same. Hodgson just says "an Italian order of architecture"; South Tyneside say "formal Classical" and mention "Corinthian pilasters" (we should do that too), so "Renaissance" is actually uncited. Perhaps "Classical Italianate style" would work as a phrase.
  • Sounds good, I have changed it.

• "shipping professionals" is a gross anachronism for 1847; "shipping merchants" would be more like it.
  • Thanks, I've changed it.

• £3,000: how much is that now, allowing for inflation? There are citable calculators on the web.
  • I've used the inflation calculator template which was a very close match to the Bank of England calculator.

• "another memorial was sent" - a memo, presumably.
  • Makes sense! Have changed it.

• Who is "Thos William" and who says so? He's not in [5] South Tyneside?
  • His name is in the Historic England article, I have added a citation.

• " a Grade II listed building on 25 January 1978 and is one of four Grade II listed buildings" - please reword to be a little less repetitive.
  • I have reworded.

Images

• All the images appear to be correctly (at least plausibly) licensed on Commons.

Sources

• Other than as mentioned above, all the spot-checks I tried worked out fine.

Chiswick Chap Thank you for your review, I have addressed all your comments so please do let me know if you have any further suggestions or questions! Thanks for your interest in the topic :) Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 20:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.