Talk:Curriculum mapping

(not a frequent editor, so I'm not sure what 'good form' for discussion is:) This article reads like it was written by a marketer for "curriculum mapper"67.186.178.202 (talk) 23:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC), the software that it refers to throughout. It certainly has a point of view: they want you to buy the service! I have found it difficult to find any original research on the subject.67.186.178.202 (talk) 23:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)An irate student[reply]

I also found this page problematic. I was highly bothered that reference citation #2 did not take me where promised, but instead directed me to a "for purchase" product. Fosterinegypt (talk) 07:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is this article about?

Though the article contains a lot of subsidiary information, it barely says what curriculum mapping is or how it's done and explains nothing about why it's done. The closest it gets is the first sentence: "Curriculum Mapping is a procedure for reviewing the operational curriculum as it is entered into an electronic database at any education setting." What kind of review? For what purpose? What kind of procedure, and how does it differ from other procedures? Is curriculum mapping not curriculum mapping when the review is conducted without entering anything into an electronic database? "At any education setting" seems unhelpful and redundant in the same sense as "in a room with walls of any color" would be, since I wasn't expecting that it would exist in only some education settings.

I'm going to have to look somewhere to find out what it is. For what it's worth, I'm guessing that it means to draw lines (literally, on a diagram, or metaphorically) between the elements of the curriculum being used and the elements of a standard curriculum, to demonstrate that every element of the standard curriculum is being met by one or more elements of the de facto curriculum. But this is only a guess. Can someone with knowledge on the subject please add some explanatory material to the article? —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curriculum mapping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100602145908/http://www.doe.in.gov/TitleI/leaimprovement/improvement_corrective_action.html to http://www.doe.in.gov/TitleI/leaimprovement/improvement_corrective_action.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]