Talk:Cryptodidymosphaerites

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Cryptodidymosphaerites appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Cryptodidymosphaerites is a parasite of a parasite?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cryptodidymosphaerites.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Cryptodidymosphaerites is a hyperparasite of an Eocene tar spot? Source: Currah, Stockey, & LePage (1998) introduction and discussion sections
- ALT1: ... that fossils of Cryptodidymosphaerites were discovered using hydrofluoric acid? Source: Currah, Stockey, & LePage (1998) materials and methods
- ALT2: ... that Cryptodidymosphaerites is a parasite of a parasite? Source: Currah, Stockey, & LePage (1998) introduction and discussion sections
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hmong bobtail dog

Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 21:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Kevmin: Great article. However, Earwig is reporting a possible copyright violation and i'd like to know why this is the case before I approve it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onegreatjoke The earwig reports for Fagus langevinii and Carpinus perryae both go to wiki-mirrors that have copied text of articles I previously wrote for taxa that are from the same fossil sites as Cryptodidymosphaerites. As such the paleoecology sections for the three articles are mostly the same since all three were written in the last year-ish.--Kev min § 13:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright.

assuming good faith I will approve this nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]