Talk:CryptLoad

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion

Keep frankly I don't see any reason to delete it because it has lots of third party sources and hundreds if not thousands of people use it. Elppin (talk) 12:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've removed my prod because the proposal is contested. Nonetheless, I don't think this is noteable. The third party sources are just download mirrors, and frankly, these days that doesn't indicate a software is noteable. Is there some independent coverage of the software other than a download link combined with a description? Has it been reviewed anywhere? Are there sources that indicate "thousands of people use it"? If you have any such sources, please cite them in the article. Singularity42 (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that the third party sources are mainly download mirrors. However some of these download mirrors, such as this one have over 100 thousand downloads so I think its safe to assume lots of people have used it. Personally I think its worth keeping because I think the article could be improved and made more useful, but I wouldn't interfere if you were to put it up for deletion again. Thanks, Elppin (talk) 22:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]