Talk:Crush (video game)
Crush (video game) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 8, 2009. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
Fair use rationale for Image:Crush 2d.jpg
[edit]Image:Crush 2d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Crush 3d.jpg
[edit]Image:Crush 3d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Crush boxart.jpg
[edit]Image:Crush boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
References
[edit]A quick glance through the article revealed to me that several claims made were not sourced as claimed. This is just dire FA review work.--ZincBelief (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Some that you noted were actually in the source given - but in the hard-to-see-that-its-there second page of the reference (the stuff about MC Escher, etc.) The female persona can only be sourced to the game itself (and its only clear when playing it, as the voicework is decidedly female but there's no lines to establish any gender). The last statement seems to follow appropriately from the original source line "The acclaim didn't translate into sales in quite the way the team had hopes..." --MASEM (t) 13:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- True, I missed page 2, doesn't actually display properly in my browser. However - female voice and female persona are not the same thing. If it's a robot, an AI, then the persona can be said to be gender neutral. It is POV to say it is a female persona.--ZincBelief (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- The manual, and the doctor that created it, call the computer (it's not a robot or anything else like that, just a computer) a "her". I agree if it was just a female voice, attributing gender to it doesn't do much (eg, I wouldn't call Star Trek's computers to be "female" just because of the female voice). But both the manual and dialog distinctly add the gender. --MASEM (t) 13:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, those should be used for the reference then.--ZincBelief (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- The manual, and the doctor that created it, call the computer (it's not a robot or anything else like that, just a computer) a "her". I agree if it was just a female voice, attributing gender to it doesn't do much (eg, I wouldn't call Star Trek's computers to be "female" just because of the female voice). But both the manual and dialog distinctly add the gender. --MASEM (t) 13:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- True, I missed page 2, doesn't actually display properly in my browser. However - female voice and female persona are not the same thing. If it's a robot, an AI, then the persona can be said to be gender neutral. It is POV to say it is a female persona.--ZincBelief (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Crush 3D should probably be merged, right? --Mika1h (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Pretty much yes. This article's short enough that even if C3D is a total overall, it can incorporate those changes. --MASEM (t) 01:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crush (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170113121453/http://411mania.com/games/crush-3d-3ds-review/ to http://411mania.com/games/crush-3d-3ds-review/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- FA-Class Sega articles
- Sega task force articles
- Old requests for WikiProject Video Games peer review
- WikiProject Video games articles