Talk:Crowborough

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Don't borrow copyrighted text

The recently added text seems to have been taken from crowborough.info, and so is probably copyrighted. I have therefore removed it. If the copyright owner allows it to be used on Wikipedia, then please note that here, and restore the text. (A {{copyvio}} notice might have resulted in deletion of the whole article, which is why I'm going about it this way.) --Stemonitis 08:13, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

AMORC

Where is the source for this claim: "Also home of the English Grand Lodge for Europe and Africa of the Rosicrucian Order, AMORC."? --Anon

Here on amorc.org.uk I suppose. I've lived here for years though I and I'd never heard of them. --Rup 23:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can a PO Box qualify as a "home"?

Agree with above -- AMORC entry should be deleted.

Lived in Crowborough for several years and had family there until recently. The English Grand Lodge for Europe and Africa of the Rosicrucian Order was located out in an area called Friars Gate when I used to deliver mail to them as a Royal Mail postman. Whether they're still there I have no idea. Additionally the Finnart House complex -which was once a school- became a Scientologist HQ ...again perhaps temporarily.

Hills of East Sussex

I also cannot understand why it should be categorised under Hills of East Sussex? Ok the town is at the top of a hill, but there is no mention in the article of it being itself a hill! Please explain Peter Shearan 14:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do it, but Crowborough is notable for being one of the highest points in East Sussex so we should mention that. I'll dig out an O/S map sometime and find a height. Yes, there's one on crowborough.info but we should find our own :-) --Rup 23:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The town is on the summit of a Marilyn, making it notable to the hillbagging community. I'll add some iunfo on this to the article. Grinner 10:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Twinning

I'm in Horwich, you're twinned with us! Woo! ...how do towns choose who to twin with? TR_Wolf

Is the Crowborough Directory a valid link?

The site Crowborough Directoryappears to have no value other than to promote an advertising magazine.
Links to be avoided:
1. Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain.
4. Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services.

--Smcginn 17:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on article

The editors of this article should be aware of the Wiki article on How to write about settlements. As it is now it is just a very long set of uncoordinated statements. There is nothing about the History or the Geography (except the bit about the height); in fact the dozen headings that should be here are quite lacking. There isn't even a proper introduction - just one line "C... is the largest inland town in E Sussex ....: and even that isn't particularly striking, since Hailsham had a mere 281 people fewer in 2001. I won't belabour the point, but I am setting out now to get this article into shape Peter Shearan (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.crowborough-mini-railway.vze.com
Triggered by \bvze\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Crowborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120226062045/http://theweald.org/P5H.asp?Pid=5050Crowbo to http://theweald.org/P5H.asp?Pid=5050Crowbo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Crowborough/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Cite sources using Wikipedia:Footnotes Assessment made by Steinsky at 15:37, 6 September 2006

Last edited at 20:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crowborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051023014920/http://www.localauthoritypublishing.co.uk/councils/crowborough/ to http://www.localauthoritypublishing.co.uk/councils/crowborough/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crowborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]