Talk:Cross (association football)

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Forward (association football)#Second striker|supporting strikers]] The anchor (#Second striker) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Linking to cricket?

The links for outswinger and inswinger lead to pages about cricket. Maybe somebody with a clue or two could change this? TIA --78.52.5.141 (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. Instead, each type of cross (eg Low cross, curved cross, chip etc) needs to be analysed. Anyone, who is an expert, care to express themselves? I have decided (I am not expert, unfortunately) to expand on this, but these are uncited hypothetical statements, yet to be proven or theorised. I added some points that need to confirmed, and I understand that the language is rudimentary, but at least I tried to expand the stale stub. Maybe the changes are too hasty and may be reverted, but revision is the key in my opinion. (Lord Shivan (talk) 06:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Help

This article needs to be improved. The current statements are un-cited and are mere hypothesis. Diagrams illustrating the positions of the players while a cross occurring is an idea I have, and more deep and concise paragraphs too. Lord Shivan (talk) 00:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]