Talk:Croatian War of Independence/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 07:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

Clearly a lot of work has gone into this article so far but unfortunatley I believe that there is still quite a way to go. Indeed IMO this meets the GA quick-fail criteria as large sections are unreferenced and therefore fails Wikipedia:Verifiability. As such, given the amount of work required I am going to have to fail this rather than place it on hold. However, I do believe that this could be brought up to GA standard in time and I would encourage the editors to add the citations required and then request a peer review before putting it up for another GA nomination. In order to assist with this I have added {{cn}} tags where inline citations are required. Please let me know if you require any further guidance with this. Anotherclown (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this assessment. A peer review would be the best way to try to iron out some of the issues with the article. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I have failed this now. Thanks for correcting the tag also. Anotherclown (talk) 08:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]