Talk:Greek Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Latin rite
[edit]Section which says: Note that most Catholic bishops in Croatia are of the Latin rite has a wiki link to article Latin rite which is a disambiguation page. Could someone knowledgeable care to correct this to point to one of these two:
- Latin Rite - for the Latin particular Church within the Roman Catholic Church
- Latin liturgical rites - for liturgical rites used within that particular Church
? Those two entries to articles are the ones which are stated on that particular disambiguation page Latin rite. --Biblbroks's talk 18:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Directed to Latin Rite. Vilĉjo 11:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- I question the relevance of the sentence cited. The same would be true in almost every nation in which there is an Eastern or Oriental Catholic Church headquartered, but that does not make it an encyclopedic fact noteworthy for inclusion here. If this were an article titled 'Catholicism in Croatia' or a 'Religion' section in an article titled 'Croatia', it might have a basis for inclusion. Here, it has none. (On a second look, given that this article is so titled as to include not only Croatia, but also Serbia and Montenegro, the sentence has even less validity.) Irish Melkite (talk) 08:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- This sentence dates from the time when the article was named "Croatian Catholic Church" or "Byzantine Catholics in former Yugoslavia", so that sentence made sense to avoid ambiguity. In the meantime, the article was moved away from such ambiguous titles. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Liturgical Language
[edit]Would someone please verify if they Liturgical Language of this Church is indeed OLD CHURCH SLAVONIC and not the slightly newer Church Slavonic that all other Slavic Rite Catholics use. I recognize that it is possible that they still use this language but it is highly unlikely. Would someone please check into this and post a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.127.251.137 (talk) 02:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Evidently the form used in the one source currently cited in the article.--Cúchullain t/c 13:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Cúchullain t/c 13:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Croatian Greek Catholic Church → Byzantine Church of Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro – official name as in Annuario Pontificio 2012, p. 1140. Relisted. BDD (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Esoglou (talk) 19:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
opposecreate a new article Byzantine Church of Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro, this is a historical article on Croatian Greek Catholic Church.--Sokac121 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)- Support after a small deal.--Sokac121 (talk) 21:12, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Sokac121, there's little specifically Croatian history in there, so this content can be moved to the new page, and then when someone actually writes what you're saying, that can be put in place of the redirect. History of this church since 1918 is not specifically Croatian, per sources such as this CNEWA article, so this change had already happened almost a century ago. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- I do not like this change [1] Sočice have nothing to do with Serbia and Montenegro. Let in articles about Croatia stay Croatian Greek Catholic Church, and I am to move. --Sokac121 (talk) 13:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- I concur, that was just anachronistic. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support per JoyShallot. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME vs. WP:OFFICIALNAME. Wikipedia prefers common names over official names. The official name is very uncommon in literature (zero hits on google books, zero hits on google scholar) --RJFF (talk) 10:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't believe the current name is all that common in reference to the Exarchate in Serbia and Montenegro. In fact I'd be plenty surprised if it wasn't a fair bit of an insult to refer to them as "Croatian Greek Catholics". --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Serbia and Montenegro is former state, In Montenegro and Serbia not live Greek Catholics. Living in Vojvodina (Serbia), Croatia and northern Bosnia (Banja Luka, Prnjavor.) Montenegro has nothing to do with Greek Catholic Church. I think that this term "Byzantine Church of Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro" refers to former state.--Sokac121 (talk) 12:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the term is old, and Montenegro is there pro forma, but they do live in Serbia - see Apostolic Exarchate of Serbia and Montenegro. It seems clear that this article should use that cover name, but that the Croatian Greek Catholic Church history should be at Eparchy of Križevci. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Byzantine Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160430153301/http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/documents/AAS-93-2001-ocr.pdf to http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/documents/AAS-93-2001-ocr.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Greek Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140723001007/http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/documents/2013/febbraio2013.pdf to http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/documents/2013/febbraio2013.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Catholic Church naming conventions RfC
[edit]There is currently an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Catholic Church)#RfC: should this page be made a naming convention that may be of interest. Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Greek Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia
[edit]what have the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Križevci to do with Serbia ?, Croatia is an independent state. There is no thing "Greek Catholic Church in Coratia and Serbia, only in wet wishes of Ex-Jugoslav Communists. Greek Catholics have a Greek Catholic Eparchy of Ruski Krstur for Montenegro and Serbia, and Macedonian Greek Catholic Church (Why you don't call ist Greek Catholic Church of Serbia and Macedonia?) Wikipedia is more then a joke, full of communist unhuman propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E7:4F28:1600:5E0:D6F9:904B:90D1 (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Mid-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- Start-Class Croatia articles
- Mid-importance Croatia articles
- All WikiProject Croatia pages
- Start-Class Serbia articles
- Mid-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles
- Start-Class Slovenia articles
- Low-importance Slovenia articles
- All WikiProject Slovenia pages