Talk:Criticism of pandeism

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Theology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Epistemology#Irrationalism|irrationalism]] The anchor (#Irrationalism) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The place to discuss this draft. Hyperbolick (talk) 18:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a draft, so things in here now might not be in the article when done.

Not about love

This review criticizes an anthology about pandeism for not talking much about love.[1] I think there is something to this, but it would need more sources before any inclusion in the article.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a very good find —- thank you. Hyperbolick (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because It has been here since before the website that copies it, so it is the website which is the copyvio. --Hyperbolick (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Jaspers

Dropping here: [2] Hyperbolick (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Olson' here is Alan M. Olson. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the whole quote.

According to [Alan M.] Olson, Jaspers's perception of ciphers stresses the centrality of the individual experiencing the constitution of the symbol and activity involved in interpreting it, compared with Christian theology, which grants a different weight to the individual and to the symbolic aspects of religion. In his opinion, the fear that pandeism or the tendency to reduce faith into the external means by which it is obtained would eventually lead to the viewing of these means as having purely subjective, and also mutable, validity, was behind the Catholic church's emphasis on the objective truth of the symbols themselves in relation to the individual religious experience.

- Ronny Miron, Karl Jaspers: From Selfhood to Being (Rodopi 2012), p. 249, ISBN 9042035315.

Dropping these here as well

Knujon Mapson (December 29, 2022). "Pandeism… author answers misconceptions". Register Publications.

Adrienne Greene (October 30, 2018). "Ask… Pastor: The universe is not God; God made the universe" (PDF). Register Publications.

Going to cut “As unscientific” section as SYNTH

Looking on this section, takes one single mention by one single author that Hegel was a Pandeist, and stretches that around unrelated analyses of Hegelian dialectics, from sources making no mention at all of pandeism. Perhaps better used on another page. Hyperbolick (talk) 13:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]