The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
It's truly intriguing and interesting to see this article in comparison to criticism of Islam article, or article on criticism of Christianity. Most of all it's amazing how we are able to write a thorough and long texts in these articles critical of everything Islamic, and I mean, o boy, Criticism of Islam article is humongous and written in a fashion of some official academic or governmental expose, but somehow very rarely checked for misusing of sources.
So, at first it was really strange that this article had been scrutinized like no other and found that its sources were "misused", but we are often very sensitive in case of all other articles critical of everything Jewish or Israeli, but then again, shouldn't we all be in line with old proverb “balanced and Zionist in nature.”
@Santasa99: It sounds like you're of the opinion that editors biased in favor of Judaism have made this article shorter than articles critical of Islam and Christianity, or that editors biased against Islam have made that criticism article longer. That may be the case, though sometimes articles end up different lengths because editors who are most active simply have different interests. It's also possible that there is simply a different amount of material to cover for different religions, or a different constellation of subarticles to which content has been offloaded. I do think it would be very surprising if the people who love a particular religion diligently documented every notable criticism of it, so really we need people of all perspectives to make balanced articles. In any case, if you think this article is too short, the only cure is to provide content backed by reliable sources. If you think other articles make dubious claims or use unreliable sources, point them out. If your additions and deletions ring true, consensus will support them in the long run. -- Beland (talk) 09:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, completely. In the meantime I learned to accept inner dynamics of our project with all its obvious shortcomings. It is unfortunate, but not surprising, that the project reflect our worldly identity troubles, often turning it into digital battleground, a battle of wills if you will, or as one Serbian chauvinist politician once said, before ending his career in Hague's prison units, that "peace is just continuation of war with other means".-౪ Santa ౪99°12:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be interesting to put criticism of circumcision in this article, which has a long history. For example, Judeans were not allowed to participate in the Olympics (which were naked) due to the Romans considering them to be deformed/mutilated. Paul had a very similar view, wishing those who advocated circumcision to castrate themselves. There's also a lot of modern examples. --Monochrome_Monitor20:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that modern examples are lacking. The Dutch medical society KNMG ([1](in Dutch) and [2]) discourages non-therapeutic circumcision. There are plenty of other recent examples. JFW | T@lk10:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Jefferson was critical of Judaism as he was of all revealed religion. He was also critical of Judaism's rituals for failing to further practical virtues. He believed Judaism lacked a belief in an afterlife, which he held was necessary for human ethical behavior in this life. Nevertheless, he argued for full rights of citizenship for America's Jews and assiduously defended their freedom of religion.[1][2]
This seems more relevant to the TJ article. It isn't philosophical crit (which was the section it was in) it is practical / utilitatrian; and TJ's views on citizenship are irrelevant here William M. Connolley (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]