Talk:Critical philosophy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Modern philosophy

Untitled

Although this article is a stub, I would like to voice my (intermediate-expert) opinion that this is an important article. The distinction between criticism and positivism supplies an important perspective on developments after Kant in 19th century philosophy. It compliments the article on positivism. If I had more time, I would expand on this myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.66.193 (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article really needs to be brought up to Wikipedia standards, big walls of text aren't pretty. --74.15.40.223 (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio

Found some copyright violations, from [here http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/sl/sl_iv.htm]. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time now, but I'll come back to try to sort some of what is and isn't stolen text later... Faithfully, Deltopia (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page header says "Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830) Part One" - which leads me to believe this source was published in 1830. That would make this public domain. As such, I've removed the tag - feel free to replace it if you want another admin to take a look. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original publication in 1830 (or whenever) would have been in German. The English translation was apparently only published in 1970. I am not a lawyer, and have no idea what the copyright status of translations is; but since I can't rule out the possibility that the translator ("William Wallace") owns at least some (?) of the copyright, I'm going to replace the tag just in case. -- simxp (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for help at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights#Copyright Status of Translations -- simxp (talk) 00:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]