Talk:Creativity techniques

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links

This section looks very poor to me. It's tone is not neutral, descriptive and it seems to contain a lot of mumbo jumbo. Masahiko 10:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Surname links are usually bad

Who are Osborn and Miles? Certainly not disambiguation pages. TimBentley (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External link cleanup

After going through all the links, I was tempted to remove them all. I left a half dozen, but am not really pleased with them either. Let's try to hold to WP:EL and WP:SPAM, please. --Ronz 15:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone's watching

I'm working on the creativity page, and I'll be doing my best to make this page more useful for that page (it's long) by moving material here. If anyone has stuff to offer, it would be great. At the moment the biggest issue seems to be that this page is not sourced, and has various musings rather more than material based in the literature.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Creativity techniques. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080706010359/http://www.cognos.com/newsletter/decisions/st_070307_01.html to http://www.cognos.com/newsletter/decisions/st_070307_01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal, March 2017

I propose that Group creativity techniques, created by User:Silver Master today, be merged into Creativity techniques. Many of the techniques listed or described in Creativity techniques are already techniques that are used by groups, so it seems unwarranted to have separate articles for "individual" and "group" creativity techniques. Biogeographist (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you can understand enough of Group creativity techniques to merge it into this article, I would suggest that you be WP:Bold and go ahead and do it. If there's not enough there to merge, it can simply be redirected here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: I will do it 30 days after the merge proposal, per WP:Merging. Biogeographist (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suit yourself, but that it what WP:BOLD is for. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: On second thought, I agree that enough time has already passed to merge now. Biogeographist (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Y Merger complete. — No objections after a couple of weeks. Biogeographist (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal proposal, September 2018

The Web 2.0 section seems very out-of-place in this article as it doesn't describe a technique, but describes collaborative aspects of Web 2.0 in vague terms without citation. Hadley12656 (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The single source it had was a wikispace that's now gone. I boldly deleted the whole section. OsFish (talk) 02:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

India Education Program course assignment

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]