Talk:Courts of Jersey

Jersey High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jersey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jersey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject JerseyTemplate:WikiProject JerseyJersey articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Courts of Jersey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Samedi division of the Royal Court, one of the Courts of Jersey, sits on a Friday, rather than a Saturday as the name suggests?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/February.

Wikipedia

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[inquisitorial system#Criminal justice|inquisitorial systems]] The anchor (#Criminal justice) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Tribunals

Should this article be expanded to include Tribunals (e.g. the Employment Tribunal), or would it be better for tribunals and panels that aren't actually 'courts' to be the subject of a different article?Andrew Le Sueur (talk) 06:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure - how many are there? If there are only a small number, then maybe add a tribunals section to this page which gives brief details of each one in subsections. But if there are lots, or lots to write about them, which might result in the page getting unbalanced, then just a heading and brief mention on this page, cross-referenced to a new article, might be better. DavidWard ^talk 11:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms

Ideally the article could do with an infobox, similar to: Courts of England and Wales. In the meantime, the coat of arms which the courts use will suffice. It is normal practice for articles to have an image in the top right, see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Images_for_the_lead - "allows readers to quickly assess if they have arrived at the right page". So, please do not remove it unless it is the clearly the wrong image. Danrok (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as this page features in the Politics of Jersey series, that box seems more appropriate - and it features Jersey's arms at the top. DavidWard ^talk 18:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's not the correct coat of arms. It's explained here [1].

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Courts of Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]