Talk:Country Music Association Award for Vocal Group of the Year

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!.

North8000 (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I solicit feedback about these observations regarding the 23:13, 8 June 2023 edit by Jackedano:

new text: " a group is defined as 'as an act composed of three or more people, both of whom normally perform together ...'" (two items: "as" followed by "as", even though one is inside quotes, we don't need both of them; and "both ... [of three or more people]"!)
changed text: "The award was first presented in 1967 to ..." changed to "The inaugural recipients were...". I recognize that this is not Simple Wikipedia, but calling it "inaugural" seems to suggest something extra special; we should prefer "more plain" language; perhaps there was perceived to be a possibility of some confusion like "this was the first year that this recipient received it", but I don't think using "inaugural" is the right way to go.
deleted text: Dolly Parton was the first female recipient of the award ...". Just because this is from over 50 years ago, does that mean it's no longer noteworthy?