This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
The Act is rather dense reading yet it looks like the actual Act involves what the Oligarchy describes as "domestic propaganda" as well as foreign, provided the Oligarchy alleges that said domestic propaganda is "state sponsored by foreign State Actors."
Point being it looks like the extant article leaves out a great deal of details that are in the actual Act which people might want to know about without having to deep-dive in to the actual PDF document itself. The far right wing Oligarchy gave themselves the legal ability to designate any media artifact as "foreign propaganda," predicated upon the Oligarchy's say-so that same is influenced by "foreign State actors," a nebulous and meaningless rhetorical device to ensure that domestic coverage of the Oligarchy's crimes and abuses may be suppressed "legally." Damotclese (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The date of the quoted text is "December, 2016" and Hillary Clinton was a recently defeated Presidential candidate, claiming that the "Russians" caused her to lose the election. The very LAST person whose opinion should be considered balanced, neutral or objective. Further, the quote claims Clinton "called attention" to the potentially non-existent "Russians" as if the issue was somehow a secret, and needed someone to speak up as it was being ignored. I remember, I was there during the post-election chaos of 2016 and that's the ONLY thing people were talking about. She didn't "call attention" to anything; she loudly proclaimed to all that the reason why she lost the election was because of "Russian Meddling" and the Left has stayed with that narrative for the last 2 years with little to no evidence to support it. I'm willing to tolerate a certain amount of blatant political bias in a Wikipedia Article, but this is WAY past my ability to withstand without "being bold".Tym Whittier (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, it's relevant and sourced. And your description is misleading--Clinton called attention to the legislation and its need, and as the most high-profile target of Russian interference, her input was an important part of the conversation. Her involvement is an argument for the text's inclusion, not its excision, and the argument that a quoted individual need be neutral is not one rooted in policy. Removing this text while claiming the Russian interference was "potentially non-existent" makes it pretty clear this was a POV edit. Grandpallama (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg)
