Talk:Count On Me (Bruno Mars song)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs) 01:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my name is CaliforniaDreamsFan and I'll be reviewing this article!

Infobox

If there is no artwork, then remove the cover and border section.
You've identified that the single was recorded somewhere in the production and release section, but omitted it from here? Add it please.

Done

Lead

Space between "November 7, 2011" and "It was composed".
"It was composed by Mars, Philip Lawrence, and Ari Levine, under their alias, The Smeezingtons." –––> It was written, composed, and produced by Mars, Philip Lawrence, and Ari Levine, under their alias, The Smeezingtons."
"Count On Me" is a folk and tropical record. The song's lyrics detail the importance of friendship and covey a positive message." –––> "Musically, 'Count On Me" is a folk and tropical record that lyrically details the importance of friendship and covey a positive message."
"The single had its peak position" –––> "The single peaked at"
Remove the certifications of Australia and New Zealand; it's slightly trivial and particular, noting that there are two more certifications in two other countries as listed at the bottom of the article.

Done. The second amendment is pointless, since when I say composed I'm already stating that it was written and produced by the same people.

Production and release

""Count On Me" was issued to contemporary hit radio and adult contemporary radio on November 7, 2011, in Australia by Atlantic Records and Warner Music Australia as the fifth single.[2][3]" –––> Merge it to the top paragraph since it's only one sentence.
The rest is good!

Done

Composition

Who "labeled" the track tropical and folk? Identify the reviewers/crtitics/etc.
"It was described as a "bittersweet ballad", "slow burner" and a "sandy-sweet tune". –––> By who? I assume it's by three different critics, so separate them and define them by each critic/publication.
"It draws from the works of Jason Mraz and David Cook," –––> "It draws musical elements from the works of Jason Mraz and David Cook".
To the above comment; who identifies this? Define the critic/publication.

Done

Reception

Change title to Critical reception
Funny, but it's not "Marry You", it's "Count on You".
Remove the comma after The AU Review.
"Rivas found the lyrics to be "nice positive"" –––> doesn't make sense.
"While, reviewing the album, Tim Sendra of AllMusic" –––> However, while reviewing the parent album, Tim Sendra from AllMusic"
"However, the track is" –––> "However, Sendra did say that the track is"

Done

Chart performance

"Count On Me" spent two weeks at its highest position, 13, after debuting at number 21 on August 29, 2011, in New Zealand." –––> "In New Zealand, "Count On Me" spent two weeks at its peak position of 13, after debuting at number 21 on August 29, 2011."
"In 2013, it entered the Spanish Charts on March 24, 2013, at its peak position, seven, and left the charts two weeks after" – "In 2013, it peaked at number seven on the Spanish Singles Chart and left the charts after two weeks."

Done

Certifications

Add the certifications for Austria and Switzerland in the chart performance heading because it is not featured there.

Done

Overall

Really satisfying article but just needs a bit more editing. On hold for 7 days, good luck! CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 01:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will take care of it over this week, thank you for reviewing the article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@CaliforniaDreamsFan: I have addressed all the issues and left a note on the lead, please take a second look and tell what do do you think. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, passing!

CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 07:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.