Talk:Cosmodicy

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• Theodicy
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Theodicy
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Ethics / Religion

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Merge proposal

This entire article is only two paragraphs and an extended quotation - the Theodicy article is not so long that the content couldn't fit there. ESPECIALLY since the quotation does not use "cosmodicy" in the way defined in this article. In fact, it would appear that the identification with Nietzsche is using the same definition as Ashley, neither of which is anything like an "attempt to justify the fundamental goodness of the universe. eldamorie (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]