Talk:Coronation of Elizabeth I

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Coronation of Elizabeth I is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

British Royalty Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of things named after Queen Elizabeth II which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Coronation of Elizabeth II which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Calidum 14:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– There was a discussion about this issue months ago, but since not many users participated, I decided to resubmit this request. These two pages need to be moved to the suggested titles per WP:CONSISTENCY. The articles about British monarchs' coronations follow the format of "Coronation of King X and Queen Y" or "Coronation of Queen X" (i.e. Coronation of King William IV and Queen Adelaide, Coronation of Queen Victoria, Coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra, Coronation of King George V and Queen Mary, Coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth), and a previous discussion showed that there was no consensus against using this format. As a result, there's no reason to treat these two pages differently. Keivan.f^Talk 19:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There could still be an argument for moving these pages, but WP:CONSISTENCY and the outcome of previous discussions do not favor these moves, as I pointed out last time. Talk:Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II#Requested move 9 June 2018 and Talk:List of things named after Elizabeth II#Requested move 26 June 2018 found active consensus in favor of the current titles, and were well-attended discussions; WP:CONSISTENCY (with Elizabeth II) was cited in favor of the current titles at that time. The first close said "There is consensus to move, and a well-supported policy basis in title consistency between a supertopic and its own subtopics, and in consiceness", while the second noted "consensus is clear" with respect to these pages. The discussions explicitly did not show that there was "no consensus against using this format", as I pointed out in subsequent discussion at Talk:Coronation of Elizabeth II#Requested move 18 July 2018. Dekimasuよ! 23:45, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're just interpreting a specific part of the discussion in favor of your own argument. While everyone was in favor of removing the royal titles to make the names more concise, when I suggested doing the same to the articles about coronations no Talk:List of things named after Queen Elizabeth II#Requested_move_26_June_2018 there was no specific outcome and nobody suggested removing "King" and "Queen" from the main titles. As a result, List of titles and honours of King George VI was moved to List of titles and honours of George VI but the article about his coronation was unaffected. In fact, we also have articles that include the title "King" or "Queen" in their names (an example would be King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Memorial). Thus, in this case, it's better to establish a consistency between the articles about the coronations of the British monarchs, rather than focusing on the articles that cover one specific monarch (in this case, Elizabeth II). Keivan.f^Talk 14:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per User:Dekimasu. WP:CONSISTENCY seems to suggest either the current title, both with reference to the articles mentioned and the base article Elizabeth I of England (not Queen Elizabeth I of England). WP:CONCISE obviously applies too. I don't see a compelling reason to move. — Amakuru (talk) 22:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.